2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30144-8_30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Provable Unlinkability Against Traffic Analysis Already After $\mathcal{O}(\log(n))~$ Steps!

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

6
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That was the first time when onions were explicitly used however, not under this name. This scheme was examined in details [13,11] in different adversary models.…”
Section: Anonymous Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That was the first time when onions were explicitly used however, not under this name. This scheme was examined in details [13,11] in different adversary models.…”
Section: Anonymous Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determining the number of rounds necessary for the protocol to ensure anonymity in this way is a challenging problem. Some discussion on the topic can be found in [14,1,11].…”
Section: Onion Encodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is often believed that using dummy messages to increase the traffic to the maximal amount and keeping lengths of the onion paths fixed is a proper answer to network dynamics. However, proving resilience to traffic analysis when a fraction of servers and lines is malicious depends on how often the onions are processed through honest servers and links [11]. So dummies do not help that much, as one may hope at the first look.…”
Section: Protocol Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many adversary models have been considered -some of the models allow an adversary to perform only passive traffic analysis based on information obtained from nodes and links under his control [1,11]. Other models [12,13] allow active attacks based on adding or delaying messages by an adversary.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation