2015
DOI: 10.1038/ngeo2537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protracted development of bioturbation through the early Palaeozoic Era

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
135
1
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
12
135
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Focusing on shared conditions, the second explanation ascribes the decline in exceptional preservation in the upper Neoproterozoic-lower Paleozoic to secular changes in near-surface marine environments (Allison and Briggs, 1993), which broadly affected all taphonomic processes and lastingly restricted soft tissue conservation in marine settings. Overall, the trend broadly follows the prolonged oxygenation of the ocean-atmosphere system (Gill et al, 2011; and the protracted development of the sediment mixed layer (Tarhan et al, 2015), the zone of sediment homogenized and fluidized via bioturbation by burrowing animals, in the early Paleozoic. These changes in marine environments affected exceptional preservation by promoting scavenging of buried carcasses (Allison and Briggs, 1993); enhancing the seawater concentrations of O 2 and SO 4 2 − used in the main microbial metabolisms of decay (Canfield and Farquhar, 2009;Tarhan et al, 2015); deepening the sedimentary aerobic and sulfate reduction zones in which soft tissues are most aggressively degraded Schiffbauer et al, 2014b); and reducing the prevalence of microbial mats, which facilitate authigenic/diagenetic mineralization by sealing fossils off from oxic or suboxic bottom waters (Gehling, 1999;Laflamme et al, 2011) and preventing efflux of precipitating geochemical species (Callow and Brasier, 2009;.…”
Section: Exceptional Preservation Through Time In Marine Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Focusing on shared conditions, the second explanation ascribes the decline in exceptional preservation in the upper Neoproterozoic-lower Paleozoic to secular changes in near-surface marine environments (Allison and Briggs, 1993), which broadly affected all taphonomic processes and lastingly restricted soft tissue conservation in marine settings. Overall, the trend broadly follows the prolonged oxygenation of the ocean-atmosphere system (Gill et al, 2011; and the protracted development of the sediment mixed layer (Tarhan et al, 2015), the zone of sediment homogenized and fluidized via bioturbation by burrowing animals, in the early Paleozoic. These changes in marine environments affected exceptional preservation by promoting scavenging of buried carcasses (Allison and Briggs, 1993); enhancing the seawater concentrations of O 2 and SO 4 2 − used in the main microbial metabolisms of decay (Canfield and Farquhar, 2009;Tarhan et al, 2015); deepening the sedimentary aerobic and sulfate reduction zones in which soft tissues are most aggressively degraded Schiffbauer et al, 2014b); and reducing the prevalence of microbial mats, which facilitate authigenic/diagenetic mineralization by sealing fossils off from oxic or suboxic bottom waters (Gehling, 1999;Laflamme et al, 2011) and preventing efflux of precipitating geochemical species (Callow and Brasier, 2009;.…”
Section: Exceptional Preservation Through Time In Marine Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extant meioendobenthic organisms are particularly important contributors to biogeochemical cycling, microbial ecology and ecosystem productivity, especially in muddy sediments 27,37 . Multiple studies discuss the trace fossil record of macrofaunal behaviour from the late Ediacaran onwards, its postulated impacts on sediment geochemistry and benthic ecology, and its role in ecosystem engineering and ecological escalation 1,2,8 . Constraining the deep time origins of a meiofaunal mode of life may be equally important for understanding the biological and chemical evolution of marine sedimentary environments.…”
Section: Nature Ecology and Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our understanding of early animal evolution is complemented by ichnological investigations of latest Ediacaran to Ordovician strata 1,2,8 . Diverse ichnofossil assemblages in the earliest Cambrian place an important constraint on the tempo of bilaterian origins, as they indicate that some groups, including total group panarthropods and priapulid-like scalidophorans 2,9 , were globally distributed and abundant by this point.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A method that provides quantitative measures for bioturbation and sediment mixing during this critical interval could have important applications. Bioturbation intensity (BI) has generally two components (horizontal and vertical), which show different aspects of infaunal behavior; the vertical component is usually the one used to analyze advances or innovation in trace making (Droser et al, 2005bSeilacher, 2007;Tarhan et al, 2015). Here we propose an adjusted BI for 3D data, the Volumetric Bioturbation Intensity (VBI).…”
Section: Estimating Bioturbation Intensity: 3d Vs 2dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal trace fossils from the Ediacaran Period (635-541 Ma) are often particularly difficult to examine due to their small size, their simplicity, and their tendency to be preserved on a single plane of preservation (Droser et al, 2005a;Jensen et al, 2005;Sappenfield et al, 2011). Additionally, simple animal traces from the Ediacaran Period are sometimes similar to tubular body fossils and their preservation in microbial substrates renders it difficult to distinguish Ediacaran body and trace fossils based on bedding plane observation alone (Droser et al, 1999(Droser et al, , 2002Jensen et al, 2006;Sappenfield et al, 2011;Tarhan et al, 2015Tarhan et al, , 2013. Lamonte trevallis is a relatively large Ediacaran ichnospecies that is preserved differently than most trace fossils from the time period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%