2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/roman.2016.7745212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prototyping realistic long-term human-robot interaction for the study of agent migration

Abstract: Abstract-This paper examines participants' experiences of interacting with a robotic companion (agent) that has the ability to move its "mind" between different robotic embodiments to take advantage of the features and functionalities associated with the different embodiments in a process called agent migration. In particular, we focus on identifying factors that can help the companion retain its identity in different embodiments. This includes examining the clarity of the migration behaviour and how this beha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, this does not directly explain why the AMR proximity decreased the walking speed or increased the hesitation probability in terms of personal space. The distance between humans and robots has also been discussed from the viewpoint of participants' traits [68] and habituation, as revealed by a study conducted over several weeks [69][70][71][72]. In addition, the preferred distance changed depending on the experience with the robots [73].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, this does not directly explain why the AMR proximity decreased the walking speed or increased the hesitation probability in terms of personal space. The distance between humans and robots has also been discussed from the viewpoint of participants' traits [68] and habituation, as revealed by a study conducted over several weeks [69][70][71][72]. In addition, the preferred distance changed depending on the experience with the robots [73].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NIES works by connecting the episodic scenarios with an overall cohesive narrative, resulting in a sequence of significant events that participants may empathize with and experience during the sessions. It gives participants a more holistic, ongoing, and focused contact experience with the research prototypes (KOAY et al, 2016).…”
Section: Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our motivation to include the mechanism of migration in our studies was based on the concept of one companion agent that may move between different robot embodi- ments while maintaining its memory and interaction history. Such changes in embodiment may be necessitated for example, by a breakdown of a specific robot platform or the need to access different functionalities and capabilities of another robot platform [37][38][39][40]. Moreover, future companion robots cannot be expected to have all functionalities that a user might want at that particular time or in future.…”
Section: Robotic Platformsmentioning
confidence: 99%