35th Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference and Exhibit 2000
DOI: 10.2514/6.2000-2881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prototype solar panel development and testing for a Mercury Orbiter spacecraft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At that point the approach for both the spacecraft and instruments was firm, the planned launch targeted an optimized March 2004 window (Yen, 2001;McAdams et al, 2002), and backup launches in May 2004 and July to August 2004 were identified. The overall spacecraft concept and all subsystems were designed (e.g., Ercol and Santo, 1999;Ercol et al, 2000;Persons et al, 2000;Wallis and Cheng, 2001;Vaughan et al, 2001;Dakermanji et al, 2002;Krupiarz et al, 2002;Nhan et al, 2002;Conde et al, 2002;Ling et al, 2002;Moore, 2002;OÕShaughnessy and Vaughan, 2003;Krupiarz, 2003; Stilwell et al, 2003;Stratton et al, 2003;Hauck and Finnigan, 2003;Heiligman et al, 2003).…”
Section: Design and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At that point the approach for both the spacecraft and instruments was firm, the planned launch targeted an optimized March 2004 window (Yen, 2001;McAdams et al, 2002), and backup launches in May 2004 and July to August 2004 were identified. The overall spacecraft concept and all subsystems were designed (e.g., Ercol and Santo, 1999;Ercol et al, 2000;Persons et al, 2000;Wallis and Cheng, 2001;Vaughan et al, 2001;Dakermanji et al, 2002;Krupiarz et al, 2002;Nhan et al, 2002;Conde et al, 2002;Ling et al, 2002;Moore, 2002;OÕShaughnessy and Vaughan, 2003;Krupiarz, 2003; Stilwell et al, 2003;Stratton et al, 2003;Hauck and Finnigan, 2003;Heiligman et al, 2003).…”
Section: Design and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was decided early in development that the system-level thermal vacuum test would be done at GSFC in a nonsolar simulator environment. Specialized solar simulation testing of engineering model solar arrays, Digital Sun Sensor Heads (DSSHs), radio frequency (RF) antennas, solar monitor, and sunshade were performed at the Glenn Research Center (GRC) Tank 6 thermal-vacuum chamber (Ercol et al 2000). Originally designed to simulate near-Earth solar conditions for the Solar Dynamic Power Experiment, the original test setup was modified to produce an 11-Sun equivalent solar environment over approximately 1.5 m 2 .…”
Section: Thermal Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometry of the orbit about Mercury was also chosen to limit the worst-case exposure conditions. The solar panels are necessarily exposed to the Sun throughout the mission and were specially designed to handle the temperatures and solar input flux expected at 0.3 AU [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%