2017 IEEE Second Ecuador Technical Chapters Meeting (ETCM) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/etcm.2017.8247530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prototype reduction algorithms comparison in nearest neighbor classification for sensor data: Empirical study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prototype selection criteria (PS) allow decreasing the data used as the input, the intrinsic knowledge of the high volume of data obtained being converged. Among all the PS methods, the most prevailing method for eliminating redundant data is the condensed nearest neighbor (CNN) algorithm, since it has been computationally proven to be suitable for reducing a large number of instances at a low computational cost [ 36 , 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prototype selection criteria (PS) allow decreasing the data used as the input, the intrinsic knowledge of the high volume of data obtained being converged. Among all the PS methods, the most prevailing method for eliminating redundant data is the condensed nearest neighbor (CNN) algorithm, since it has been computationally proven to be suitable for reducing a large number of instances at a low computational cost [ 36 , 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 169 ] Processing sensor data in real time can consume a significant amount of power, which can reduce battery life. [ 170 ] This can be a significant challenge, especially for wearable devices that are designed to be portable and used for extended periods. [ 171 ] To address this contradiction, researchers have started investigating neuromorphic computing, which exhibits desirable properties, including analogue computation, low power consumption, fast inference, event‐driven processing, online learning, and massive parallelism.…”
Section: Challenges and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third challenge related to processing involves computational issues. The computational cost of recognizing thousands of gestures is quite challenging [46].The processing of data is often computationally expensive [71], and, in the case of multiple data flows, must be optimized to achieve the desirable performance [69]. The fourth challenge related to processing is time issues that arise due to the lack of process data of hand gestures in the time dimension [72].…”
Section: ) Challenges Related To Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%