The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019 International Radar Conference (RADAR) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/radar41533.2019.171335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prototype Development and Experimental Performance Evaluation of FMCW Radar Using Iterative Interference Suppression Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Achieving autonomous driving hinges significantly on the effectiveness of onboard sensing techniques in perceiving the surrounding environment. In contrast to camera and LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging), radar system offers cost-effectiveness and excels in resilience against adverse weather conditions, backlighting, and various other environmental factors [3]. Chirp Sequence (CS) radar, in particular, is considered a promising mainstay in onboard radar systems due to its ability to simultaneously detect distances and relative velocities of multiple targets [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Achieving autonomous driving hinges significantly on the effectiveness of onboard sensing techniques in perceiving the surrounding environment. In contrast to camera and LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging), radar system offers cost-effectiveness and excels in resilience against adverse weather conditions, backlighting, and various other environmental factors [3]. Chirp Sequence (CS) radar, in particular, is considered a promising mainstay in onboard radar systems due to its ability to simultaneously detect distances and relative velocities of multiple targets [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inter-radar interference [7] can be divided into two types: wideband interference [3], which results in an increased noise level in the frequency spectrum and causes the miss detection on targets; and narrowband interference [8], which generates fake peak in the frequency spectrum and leads to false detections of non-existent targets (i.e., ghost targets). Compared to narrowband interference, wideband interference is much easier to occur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%