1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf01284560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protonium annihilation in optical models

Abstract: We calculate the wave-functions, energy shifts and widths of low lying protonium states using different optical potentials (Dover-Richard, Kohno-Weise). The importance of tensor and isospin coupling is studied and the initial state distortion is compared for protonium annihilation and pp annihilation in flight at low energy. We study the range of distances at which annihilation actually occurs in protonium. We also analyse the effect of the initial state interaction on two meson branching ratios and underline … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
97
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
97
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a reasonable approximation, we just take the statistical weight for spin triplet and singlet population, i.e., w(3S1)/w(1So)= 3/1. For the high-lying s-states, the strong interaction distortion of initial states discussed in [16,17] is not expected to have a significant influence.…”
Section: (Tc+p - 3no] Geff(ss; T=0)[iop Zso) ~ (7r+ P-3piiv~ff(ss;mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As a reasonable approximation, we just take the statistical weight for spin triplet and singlet population, i.e., w(3S1)/w(1So)= 3/1. For the high-lying s-states, the strong interaction distortion of initial states discussed in [16,17] is not expected to have a significant influence.…”
Section: (Tc+p - 3no] Geff(ss; T=0)[iop Zso) ~ (7r+ P-3piiv~ff(ss;mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In addition, different experimental groups have proposed phenomenological fits to the low-energy cross sections leading to different zeroenergy limits [7]. The second point, namely the problem of I V (0) ]2, is that quark models of annihilation say that annihilation "range" depends on the process (see [8] for a recent discussion of the annihilation ranges), and therefore the use of the same value for I V (0) 12 in (2) and (3) is at best arbitrary. The correction due to P-wave annihilation is quite sizeable (see [9]) and we shall explicitly take it into account.…”
Section: (5)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that we restricted the considerations of Ref. [14] to the pentaquark components with the uuds configurations [31] …”
Section: Strangeness Magnetic Moment and Spin Of The Protonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the functions γ(I, J), depending on the initial-state interaction, are related to the probability for a protonium state to have isospin I and spin J with the normalization condition γ(0, J)+γ(1, J) = 1. Here we adopt for a protonium state the probability γ(I, J) and the total decay width Γ tot (J) obtained in an optical potential calculation [31], where explicit values are listed in [29]. In Table III we give the theoretical results for the branching ratios of Eq.…”
Section: Is Derived Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation