Recent Advances in Hydride Chemistry 2001
DOI: 10.1016/b978-044450733-4/50002-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protonation of Transition Metal Hydrides to Give Dihydrogen Complexes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 128 publications
3
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[1] It has now been quite firmly established that when both a hydride ligand and a metal-based electron pair are present in the same complex, proton donors show a kinetic preference for the hydride site, [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] though exceptions have recently been reported from studies carried out in our laboratories. [9,10] It has also been established that hydrogenbonded adducts are well-defined intermediates along the Abstract: The present contribution reports experimental and computational investigations of the interaction between [Cp*Fe(dppe)H] and different proton donors (HA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[1] It has now been quite firmly established that when both a hydride ligand and a metal-based electron pair are present in the same complex, proton donors show a kinetic preference for the hydride site, [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] though exceptions have recently been reported from studies carried out in our laboratories. [9,10] It has also been established that hydrogenbonded adducts are well-defined intermediates along the Abstract: The present contribution reports experimental and computational investigations of the interaction between [Cp*Fe(dppe)H] and different proton donors (HA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…(© Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2006) portance for catalysis and in biochemistry. [1,2] The kinetic preference for hydride versus metal protonation is now quite firmly established, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] though exceptions have recently been reported from studies carried out in our laboratories. [10,11] The proton transfer occurs via intermediates, for which characteristic spectroscopic signatures have been established, that contain hydrogen bonds between the proton donor and the proton acceptor (the metal center or a hydride ligand) (see Scheme 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…[26] While these studies made it clear that the dihydride form is thermodynamically favored, kinetics studies by Norton and co-workers led to the conclusion that the protonation at the MÀH bond (to give a dihydrogen complex) is faster than direct protonation at the metal to give the dihydride. [27] Protonations of this type [18] represent the microscopic reverse of deprotonations of dihydrogen complexes, which are known to be kinetically preferred over deprotonation of the corresponding dihydrides. [11] For the Mo analogue, Poli and coworkers observed prompt evolution of H 2 when [Mo(Cp)-(CO) 2 (PMe 3 )H] was protonated at À78 8C; they suggested the formation of an unstable molybdenum±dihydrogen complex to account for these results.…”
Section: (Pme 3 )(H) 2 ]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to hydrosilanes such as HSiEt 3 , which immediately evolve hydrogen upon protonation, many transition-metal hydrides can be protonated to give stable products. Protonation at the MÀH bond [18] produces a dihydrogen complex [11] in which an H 2 ligand is bound to the metal, while protonation at the metal gives a dihydride complex (Scheme 2).…”
Section: Stoichometric Ionic Hydrogenations With An External Acid As mentioning
confidence: 99%