1997
DOI: 10.1021/jo970652e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proton Transfers from ZCH3 to ZCH2- (Z = F, Cl, Br, OH, SH, SeH). An ab Initio Investigation

Abstract: Energy profiles for the identity-reaction carbon-to-carbon proton transfers from carbon acids of the type ZCH3 to their conjugate bases ZCH2 - have been studied by ab initio methods. Gas-phase acidities of ZCH3 species are reproduced well at MP2/6-31+G*//MP2/6-31+G*. The barriers to proton transfer relative to the separated reactants (ΔH TS) in kcal mol-1 are F (2.2), Cl (−4.2), Br (−8.2), OH (−2.1), SH (−5.7), SeH (−11.0) at MP2/6-31+G*//MP2/6-31+G*. Values at MP4/6-31+G**//MP2/6-31+G* are very similar. The o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As part of a recent study on proton-transfer reactions, Van Verth et al calculated the ion−molecule complex ( 1-c ) and backside transition state ( 1-tsb ). Their activation energy at the MP4/6-31+G(d)//HF/6-31+G(d) level (1.2 kcal/mol) is very close to the barrier calculated in this work at the [QCISD(T)/6-311+G(2d,p)]//MP2/6-31+G(d)+ZPC level (1.0 kcal/mol).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of a recent study on proton-transfer reactions, Van Verth et al calculated the ion−molecule complex ( 1-c ) and backside transition state ( 1-tsb ). Their activation energy at the MP4/6-31+G(d)//HF/6-31+G(d) level (1.2 kcal/mol) is very close to the barrier calculated in this work at the [QCISD(T)/6-311+G(2d,p)]//MP2/6-31+G(d)+ZPC level (1.0 kcal/mol).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1.2A). This has led to the determination of the Marcus intrinsic barriers for a variety of proton transfer reactions by experiment and through calculations [58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65]. 1.2A) [46,50,51], carbocation-nucleophile addition [52], bimolecular nucleophilic substitution [53,54] and other reactions [55][56][57] by assuming that their reaction coordinate profiles may also be constructed from the intersection of parabolas that describe the reactant and product states.…”
Section: The Marcus Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since even for the transition states there is significant negative charge on the Y group, the polarizability effect on their stability is rather modest. This contrasts with the reactions of the type ZCH 3 + ZC ⇄ ZC + ZCH 3 with Z = F, Cl, Br, OH, SH where the polarizability of Z has a strong barrier reducing effect …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Although the correlation based just on field and resonance effects was remarkably good ( r 2 = 0.986), it neglected polarizability effects. Because such effects can potentially be quite important, especially for gas-phase anions , but also in solution, we have now added the polarizability term σ α to our correlation (eq 11). This is shown in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%