2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proton therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: A review of the physical and clinical challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Christianen et al reported that the reduction of normal tissue complication probability for grade >2 late dysphagia at 6 months after RT was only 4.9% with swallowing sparing IMRT compared to standard parotid sparing IMRT [7]. Intensitymodulated proton therapy (IMPT) may have a potential advantage in reducing side effects compared to IMRT and VMAT [27][28][29]. However, with regard to late dysphagia, IMPT may have more benefits in the upper head and neck cancers like oropharyngeal cancer [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Christianen et al reported that the reduction of normal tissue complication probability for grade >2 late dysphagia at 6 months after RT was only 4.9% with swallowing sparing IMRT compared to standard parotid sparing IMRT [7]. Intensitymodulated proton therapy (IMPT) may have a potential advantage in reducing side effects compared to IMRT and VMAT [27][28][29]. However, with regard to late dysphagia, IMPT may have more benefits in the upper head and neck cancers like oropharyngeal cancer [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It considerably worsens patients' quality of life, increases the risk for malnutrition and infection and can therefore result in treatment interruptions that may in turn deteriorate oncological outcomes. The incidence of severe mucositis after proton irradiation for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinomas ranges between 40 and 79% (30). The impact of both bone marrow-and adipose tissue-derived MSCs on radiation-induced mucositis has been examined in several preclinical studies (19,(31)(32)(33).…”
Section: Head-and-neck Tumorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the complexity of IMPT planning, it is more resource demanding than VMAT planning [8]. In our clinic, an IMPT plan takes approximately 2.5 days from initiation of planning to the review and approval by the multidisciplinary team while this process takes approximately half a day for VMAT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%