1983
DOI: 10.1021/ma00238a032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proton spin relaxation and molecular motion in a bulk polycarbonate

Abstract: Proton spin-lattice relaxation and proton spin-lattice relaxation in the rotating frame were observed in the solid polycarbonate of l,l-dichloro-2,2-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethylene from 150 to 400 K. This polymer is suited to this type of study since it contains only a single type of proton. The relaxation times are quantitatively interpreted as a function of temperature using a correlation function-spectral density approach. Two types of correlation functions that are somewhat successful result from the one-dime… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
39
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5), which take values of a few tenths of kcal/mol (see Table 9). From the results presented above, it can be stated that semiempirical methods (especially the AM 1), even though they minimize the torsional energy barriers, can be good alternatives to highly sophisticated ab initio calculations, since results reported here show deviations between semiempirical and empirical derived parameters that are within the narrow range of variability of experimental values, and in good agreement with results reported by other authors [4,[35][36][37][38][39]. Nevertheless, it has been also reported [4] that semiempirical methods lead to bad representations of some torsions, like those of conjugate bonds, for which sophisticated ab initio calculations, including correlation effects, are sometimes necessary.…”
Section: Proper Torsionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…5), which take values of a few tenths of kcal/mol (see Table 9). From the results presented above, it can be stated that semiempirical methods (especially the AM 1), even though they minimize the torsional energy barriers, can be good alternatives to highly sophisticated ab initio calculations, since results reported here show deviations between semiempirical and empirical derived parameters that are within the narrow range of variability of experimental values, and in good agreement with results reported by other authors [4,[35][36][37][38][39]. Nevertheless, it has been also reported [4] that semiempirical methods lead to bad representations of some torsions, like those of conjugate bonds, for which sophisticated ab initio calculations, including correlation effects, are sometimes necessary.…”
Section: Proper Torsionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Detailed studies of the polycarbonate molecule suggest that a mobile carbonate unit (CO 3 ) is one defect whose motion contributes to the mechanical, dielectric and nuclear magnetic relaxation in the glassy state. [23][24][25] Other types of defects have not been identified to date. However, it is interesting to speculate on the nature of the defects in other materials.…”
Section: ϸ31 ͑18͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the importance of the subject, experimental methods capable of elucidating the details of motional mechanisms are surprisingly scarce. Among the various techniques employed in this area [4] nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) is well established although conventional proton wide line data [5] can quantitatively be analyzed in exceptional cases only [6].…”
Section: A Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%