2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.93.055207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proton radius from electron scattering data

Abstract: Background: The proton charge radius extracted from recent muonic hydrogen Lamb shift measurements is significantly smaller than that extracted from atomic hydrogen and electron scattering measurements. The discrepancy has become known as the proton radius puzzle.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

9
84
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
9
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…= 0.408 (61) (48). nsic quark spin contribution agrees d set by a recent phenomenologiental data from COMPASS [45], 1 2 ∆⌃ < 0.18. The results for L q also consistent with an analysis of tributions [45].…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…= 0.408 (61) (48). nsic quark spin contribution agrees d set by a recent phenomenologiental data from COMPASS [45], 1 2 ∆⌃ < 0.18. The results for L q also consistent with an analysis of tributions [45].…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…nsic quark spin contribution agrees d set by a recent phenomenologiental data from COMPASS [45], 1 2 ∆⌃ < 0.18. The results for L q also consistent with an analysis of tributions [45]. Using the spin sum t J g = 1 2 J q =0.092(61)(48), which Centre (CSCS) under project IDs from the John von Neumann-Institu the Jureca and the BlueGene/Q Ju research center in Jülich from a Ga perMUC with ID 44060.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first point may seem obsolete in light of the available precise low-Q 2 electron scattering data which support the upper value for the proton radius [678]. It has been argued, however, that the data may be equally compatible with the smaller radius [679][680][681] although the issue is disputed [682]. In this respect, forthcoming data at extremely low Q 2 from the PRAD experiment at Jefferson Lab [683] may help to resolve the problem.…”
Section: Overview Of Two-photon Physicsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The determination of R p from electron-proton scattering data has been discussed extensively in the literature [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. The proton radius can be determined [24] from scattering data from…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%