2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00535-005-1704-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Proton-pump inhibitor-first” strategy versus “step-up” strategy for the acute treatment of reflux esophagitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis in Japan

Abstract: The PPI-first strategy is superior to the H2RA-first "step-up" strategy with regard to both efficacy and cost-effectiveness and therefore, the PPI-first strategy is the preferred therapeutic approach for the acute medical treatment of reflux esophagitis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PPIs are more cost-effective for the J Gastroenterol (2016) 51:751-767 757 treatment of GERD than H2RAs or step-up therapy starting from H2RA [72,73]. PPIs have a superior effect in terms of heartburn symptom relief over H2RAs or alginate for the treatment of GERD diagnosed by symptoms [66,74].…”
Section: Cq: Is An Acid Suppressant Effective For the Treatment Of Gerd?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PPIs are more cost-effective for the J Gastroenterol (2016) 51:751-767 757 treatment of GERD than H2RAs or step-up therapy starting from H2RA [72,73]. PPIs have a superior effect in terms of heartburn symptom relief over H2RAs or alginate for the treatment of GERD diagnosed by symptoms [66,74].…”
Section: Cq: Is An Acid Suppressant Effective For the Treatment Of Gerd?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acute therapeutic strategies may vary according to the initial therapeutic approach, which is defined as step-up , step-down or step-in. The step-up approach consists of an initial therapy starting with compounds less effective in controlling pH (antacids, alginates or H 2 -RAs), and switching to the use of PPIs when necessary, whereas the step-down approach consists of an initial use of PPIs with a subsequent reduction of their dosage [34,35,36]. These are pharmacoeconomic models that have been critically evaluated only in a limited number of studies, although the step-up approach is now considered the less cost-effective model for treating GERD and the clinically less appropriate [35].…”
Section: Optimizing Therapy Of Gerdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The step-up approach consists of an initial therapy starting with compounds less effective in controlling pH (antacids, alginates or H 2 -RAs), and switching to the use of PPIs when necessary, whereas the step-down approach consists of an initial use of PPIs with a subsequent reduction of their dosage [34,35,36]. These are pharmacoeconomic models that have been critically evaluated only in a limited number of studies, although the step-up approach is now considered the less cost-effective model for treating GERD and the clinically less appropriate [35]. In the clinical setting, it has been observed that the step-in approach (a therapeutic model that starts with and maintains a given dose of a PPI throughout the acute treatment of GERD) is the most effective approach in relieving symptoms and promoting healing of erosions, and also the economically most advantageous therapeutic model for GERD [37].…”
Section: Optimizing Therapy Of Gerdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step-up" therapy for GERD has not been shown to be more eff ective than "step-down" therapy ( 11,12 ). However, for practitioners working in an health maintenance organization, increasing the restrictiveness of a formulary has been shown to reduce the likelihood of prescribing restricted medicines and increase the likelihood of practitioners prescribing formulary medicines (13)(14)(15)(16).…”
Section: The Red Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%