1981
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(81)85134-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proton magnetic relaxation in [N(CH3)4]2 ZnCl4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 7"1 minima observed in (TMA)2ZnCI4 were ascribed (Niemela and Heinila 1981) to arise from two inequivalent r~l^ ions. The 7"1 is expected to pass through two minima of equal value (O'ReiUy and Tsang 1967) for (NH4)2SO4, in case the two T~ minima observed were due to the presence of two inequivalent a' •,lA ions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 7"1 minima observed in (TMA)2ZnCI4 were ascribed (Niemela and Heinila 1981) to arise from two inequivalent r~l^ ions. The 7"1 is expected to pass through two minima of equal value (O'ReiUy and Tsang 1967) for (NH4)2SO4, in case the two T~ minima observed were due to the presence of two inequivalent a' •,lA ions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…(TMA)2ZnCI4 which belongs to the A2BX4 type of compounds is reported to be ferro-electric (Sawada et al 1978). Magnetic resonance and relaxation study (Blinc et al 1979) in (TMA)zZnCI4 revealed reorientational motion of the methyl group and the TMA ion, even at 120 K. Niemela and Heinila (1981) inferred from the temperature dependence of the proton spin lattice relaxation time (7"1) in (TMA)2ZnCI4 that there are two inequivalent TMA ions in this compound. The motional effects in (TMA)2HgBr4 and (TMA)2HgL investigated by proton magnetic relaxation technique are reported in this paper and the results are compared with the motional effects in (TMA)2HgCI4 reported earlier (Sarma and Ramakrishna 1984b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The T1 behaviour in this phase could be explained assuming the presence of inequivalent methyl groups. The expression for TI for inequivalent ions (Niemela and Heinila, 1981) is where N = N , + Nb + N,, and N,, Nb, N, are the number of type a, type b and type c ions respectively. The T1 behaviour and the TI minimum of 19 msec could be explained in terms of inequivalent methyl groups in the ratio 5:3.…”
Section: Moment Of Inertiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of inequivalent molecular groups, the resultant relaxation rate is given by [18] T À1 1…”
Section: Relaxationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The T 1 behaviour in phase II (340 to 119 K), could be explained in terms of inequivalent TrMA ions and inequivalent methyl groups. In the presence of inequivalent molecular groups, the resultant relaxation rate is given by [18] T À1 1…”
Section: Relaxationmentioning
confidence: 99%