2007
DOI: 10.1021/ic701759c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer in Ruthenium(II)−Pterin Complexes:  Formation of Ruthenium-Coordinated Pterin Radicals and Their Electronic Structures

Abstract: Ruthenium(II)-pterin complexes were prepared using tetradentate and tripodal tris(2-pyridylmethyl)amine (TPA) and tris(5-methyl-2-pyridylmethyl)amine (5-Me3-TPA) as auxiliary ligands together with 2-(N,N-dimethyl)-6,7-dimethylpterin (Hdmdmp) and 6,7-dimethylpterin (Hdmp) as pterin derivatives for ligands. Characterization was made by spectroscopic methods, X-ray crystallography, and electrochemical measurements. The pterin ligands coordinated to the ruthenium centers as monoanionic bidentate ligands via the 4-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reversible one-electron redox couples assigned to Ru(II)/Ru(III) were observed at 0.55 V (vs Fc/Fc + , Δ E = 60 mV) for 1 and 0.52 V (Δ E = 64 mV) for 2 . Those values are 0.28 and 0.26 V higher than those observed for 3 (0.27 V) and 4 (0.26 V), respectively, however, only 0.2 V lower than those of corresponding doubly protonated species (see Scheme 2 below) 22a. In contrast to the reversible redox behavior of deprotonated and monoanionic pterin ligands in 3 and 4 and that of corresponding doubly protonated and monocationic species, monoprotonated and neutral pterin ligands in 1 and 2 exhibited irreversible redox behavior due to “proton shift” upon one-electron reduction 21.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Reversible one-electron redox couples assigned to Ru(II)/Ru(III) were observed at 0.55 V (vs Fc/Fc + , Δ E = 60 mV) for 1 and 0.52 V (Δ E = 64 mV) for 2 . Those values are 0.28 and 0.26 V higher than those observed for 3 (0.27 V) and 4 (0.26 V), respectively, however, only 0.2 V lower than those of corresponding doubly protonated species (see Scheme 2 below) 22a. In contrast to the reversible redox behavior of deprotonated and monoanionic pterin ligands in 3 and 4 and that of corresponding doubly protonated and monocationic species, monoprotonated and neutral pterin ligands in 1 and 2 exhibited irreversible redox behavior due to “proton shift” upon one-electron reduction 21.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The reversible two-step protonation/deprotonation behavior was observed in absorption spectra of 3 and 4 in aqueous buffer solutions and in MeCN by adding HClO 4 or base as reported previously 22,23. The spectroscopic titrations were carried out to determine p K a of 3 and 4 in MeCN by using Hdcba (p K a = 17.6) for the first protonation steps.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ru(+2) coordination makes the pterin ligand more basic so that it can be protonated twice [107,108]. The doubly protonated species can be 1e − reduced to a H 2 pterin radical, observable by EPR.…”
Section: Pterin Redox Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%