Abstract:We extract the proton charge radius from the elastic form factor (FF) data using a novel theoretical framework combining chiral effective field theory and dispersion analysis. Complex analyticity in the momentum transfer correlates the behavior of the spacelike FF at finite Q 2 with the derivative at Q 2 = 0. The FF calculated in the predictive theory contains the radius as a free parameter. We determine its value by comparing the predictions with a descriptive global fit of the spacelike FF data, taking into … Show more
“…The quality of the predicted higher moments from Ref. [21] was previously tested on larger e − p scattering data sets [27]. Here we show that the PRad data set lends strong support to these theoretical results.…”
Recently published data on the Sachs electric form factor by the PRad collaboration (Nature 575, 147-151) are analyzed to investigate their consistency with the known proton charge radius from muonic and electronic hydrogen spectroscopy, as well as theoretical predictions from dispersively improved chiral perturbation theory. It is shown that the latter is fully consistent with the data, and pointers are given how future e − p scattering experiments can lead to an improvement of our knowledge of the form factor in the low-momentum-transfer regime. * marko@yorku.ca arXiv:1912.01735v4 [nucl-ex] 1 Feb 2020 R E = 0.879(8) fm. The radius R E enters the spectroscopic analysis via the slope of the Sachs electric form factor at zero momentum transfer squared Q 2 . The fact that hydrogen spectroscopy and e − p scattering are determining the same quantity is documented well in the literature [5].Since then, numerous efforts were undertaken to resolve the puzzle: (i) measurements on muonic deuterium [6] combined with the isotope shift, (ii) a fluorescence-based determination of the regular hydrogen 2S − 4P fine structure intervals [7], and (iii) a high-accuracy measurement of the Lamb shift in regular hydrogen [8] all pointed to a confirmation of the muonic hydrogen result; on the other hand (iv) a high-precision re-measurement of the 1S − 3S interval by the Paris group [9] continued to support the original higher value for the charge radius; this latter work is being contested by current fluorescence-detection work in Garching, which is achieving substantially higher precision.In more recent e − p scattering experiments both the Mainz group through a different method, based on intermediate-state radiation (ISR) [10] found consistency with the muonic charge radius (albeit with insufficient accuracy to make a strong case, so far), as did the PRad collaboration [11] which employed a gas jet target and measured projectile deflections directly.The situation still has the attention of both the spectroscopy and scattering communities, but the originally spread ideas that there could be new physics, i.e., that muons and electrons might behave differently have been damped by these developments.The significance of resolving the puzzle is not just academic, i.e., eventually, lattice gauge calculations within quantum chromodynamics will be able to compute at least certain aspects of the electric and magnetic form factors, and it will be good to have a solid understanding of the charge and current distributions of the proton based on experimental data. In addition, the determination of the charge radius leads to a significant change in the Rydberg constant
“…The quality of the predicted higher moments from Ref. [21] was previously tested on larger e − p scattering data sets [27]. Here we show that the PRad data set lends strong support to these theoretical results.…”
Recently published data on the Sachs electric form factor by the PRad collaboration (Nature 575, 147-151) are analyzed to investigate their consistency with the known proton charge radius from muonic and electronic hydrogen spectroscopy, as well as theoretical predictions from dispersively improved chiral perturbation theory. It is shown that the latter is fully consistent with the data, and pointers are given how future e − p scattering experiments can lead to an improvement of our knowledge of the form factor in the low-momentum-transfer regime. * marko@yorku.ca arXiv:1912.01735v4 [nucl-ex] 1 Feb 2020 R E = 0.879(8) fm. The radius R E enters the spectroscopic analysis via the slope of the Sachs electric form factor at zero momentum transfer squared Q 2 . The fact that hydrogen spectroscopy and e − p scattering are determining the same quantity is documented well in the literature [5].Since then, numerous efforts were undertaken to resolve the puzzle: (i) measurements on muonic deuterium [6] combined with the isotope shift, (ii) a fluorescence-based determination of the regular hydrogen 2S − 4P fine structure intervals [7], and (iii) a high-accuracy measurement of the Lamb shift in regular hydrogen [8] all pointed to a confirmation of the muonic hydrogen result; on the other hand (iv) a high-precision re-measurement of the 1S − 3S interval by the Paris group [9] continued to support the original higher value for the charge radius; this latter work is being contested by current fluorescence-detection work in Garching, which is achieving substantially higher precision.In more recent e − p scattering experiments both the Mainz group through a different method, based on intermediate-state radiation (ISR) [10] found consistency with the muonic charge radius (albeit with insufficient accuracy to make a strong case, so far), as did the PRad collaboration [11] which employed a gas jet target and measured projectile deflections directly.The situation still has the attention of both the spectroscopy and scattering communities, but the originally spread ideas that there could be new physics, i.e., that muons and electrons might behave differently have been damped by these developments.The significance of resolving the puzzle is not just academic, i.e., eventually, lattice gauge calculations within quantum chromodynamics will be able to compute at least certain aspects of the electric and magnetic form factors, and it will be good to have a solid understanding of the charge and current distributions of the proton based on experimental data. In addition, the determination of the charge radius leads to a significant change in the Rydberg constant
“…In Fig. 36, we show the data for G p E (Q 2 ) and G p M (Q 2 ) compiled by Douglas Higinbotham [43,61,62] from the cross sections provided in the Lee-Arlington-Hill supplemental material [31], who rebinned the original data obtained by the A1 Collaboration using the MAMI beam at Mainz [3,63]. The neutron data, G n E (Q 2 ), are collected from Refs.…”
Section: Appendix C: Esc In the Extraction Of The Form Factorsmentioning
We present results for the isovector (p−n) electromagnetic form factors of the nucleon using eleven ensembles of gauge configurations generated by the MILC collaboration using the highly improved staggered quark (HISQ) action with 2+1+1 dynamical flavors. These ensembles span four lattice spacings a ≈ 0.06, 0.09, 0.12 and 0.15 fm and three values of the light-quark masses corresponding to the pion masses Mπ ≈ 135, 225 and 315 MeV. High-statistics estimates using the truncated solver method method allow us to quantify various systematic uncertainties and perform a simultaneous extrapolation in the lattice spacing, lattice volume and light-quark masses. We analyze the Q 2 dependence of the form factors calculated over the range 0.05 Q 2 ∼ 1.4 GeV 2 using both the model independent z-expansion and the dipole ansatz. Our final estimates, using the z-expansion fit, for the isovector root-mean-square radius of nucleon are rE = 0.769 (27)(30) fm, rM = 0.671(48)(76) fm and µ p−n = 3.939(86)(138) Bohr magneton. The first error is the combined uncertainty from the leading-order analysis, and the second is an estimate of the additional uncertainty due to using the leading order chiral-continuum-finite-volume fits. The estimates from the dipole ansatz, rE = 0.765(11)(8) fm, rM = 0.704(21)(29) fm and µ p−n = 3.975(84)(125) Bohr magneton, are consistent with those from the z-expansion but with smaller errors. Our analysis highlights three points. First, all our data for form factors from the eleven ensembles and existing lattice data on, or close to, physical mass ensembles from other collaborations collapses more clearly onto a single curve when plotted versus Q 2 /M 2 N as compared to Q 2 with the scale set by quantities other than MN . The difference between these two ways of analyzing the data is indicative of discretization errors, some of which presumably cancel when the data are plotted versus Q 2 /M 2 N . Second, the size of the remaining deviation of this common curve from the Kelly curve is small and can be accounted for by statistical and possible systematic uncertainties. Third, to improve lattice estimates for r 2 E , r 2 M and µ, high statistics data for Q 2 < 0.1 GeV 2 are needed.
“…Apparent discrepancies between the different extraction methods (the "proton radius puzzle") have engendered intense experimental and theoretical efforts, including dedicated new elastic scattering experiments at low Q 2 with electron and muon beams [11,12]. Most recent experiments and reanalyses have converged around r p E = 0.84 fm [11,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], while some have obtained larger values [25][26][27][28]; the CODATA Task Group and the Particle Data Group have now adopted 0.84 fm as the recommended value [29,30]. The proton magnetic radius can only be extracted from elastic FF measurements (a method using atomic measurements was proposed in Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we report an extraction of the proton magnetic radius from electron scattering data using a novel theoretical framework based on dispersion analysis and chiral effective field theory (DIχ EFT) [20,[36][37][38]. It implements analyticity and the dynamics governing the shape of the low-Q 2 FFs and allows us to use data up to Q 2 ≈ 0.5 GeV 2 for constraining the radii, increasing the sensitivity to the magnetic FF.…”
We extract the proton magnetic radius from high-precision electron-proton elastic scattering cross section data. Our theoretical framework combines dispersion analysis and chiral effective field theory and implements the dynamics governing the shape of the low-Q 2 form factors. It allows us to use data up to Q 2 ≈ 0.5 GeV 2 for constraining the radii and overcomes the difficulties of empirical fits and Q 2 → 0 extrapolation. We obtain a magnetic radius r p M = 0.850 ± 0.001 (1σ fit uncertainty) +0.009 −0.004 (full-range theory uncertainty) fm, significantly different from earlier results obtained from the same data using empirical fits, and close to our extracted electric radius r p E = 0.842 ± 0.002 (1σ fit uncertainty) +0.005 −0.002 (full-range theory uncertainty) fm.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.