2019
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proton beam therapy in pediatric brain tumor patients: improved radiation delivery techniques improve neurocognitive outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Longer survival than SBRT, spares more normal liver cells from radiation damage than treating with conventional RT [39][40][41] Esophageal Proton vs. IMRT Randomized Phase II The mean total toxicity burden was considerably lower with protons than with IMRT [42] Brain (Adult) Proton Trial study unknown Significantly reduced the side effects and better neurocognition over time after treatment [43][44][45][46] Brain (Pediatric) Proton vs. Photon Trial study unknown Spared more surrounding normal tissue; reduced side effects and increased five-year survival rates (72-100%) [32,[47][48][49][50] Safer to deliver high dose of radiation and better neurocognition [44][45][46]51] 2.3.2. Carbon Ion Therapy 12 C ions are the optimal ion for treating deep-seated tumors, because the higher relative biological effectiveness (RBE) resulting from variations in linear energy transfer (LET) along the ion path can be limited to the tumor volume with minimal normal tissue injury along the entrance track.…”
Section: Proton Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longer survival than SBRT, spares more normal liver cells from radiation damage than treating with conventional RT [39][40][41] Esophageal Proton vs. IMRT Randomized Phase II The mean total toxicity burden was considerably lower with protons than with IMRT [42] Brain (Adult) Proton Trial study unknown Significantly reduced the side effects and better neurocognition over time after treatment [43][44][45][46] Brain (Pediatric) Proton vs. Photon Trial study unknown Spared more surrounding normal tissue; reduced side effects and increased five-year survival rates (72-100%) [32,[47][48][49][50] Safer to deliver high dose of radiation and better neurocognition [44][45][46]51] 2.3.2. Carbon Ion Therapy 12 C ions are the optimal ion for treating deep-seated tumors, because the higher relative biological effectiveness (RBE) resulting from variations in linear energy transfer (LET) along the ion path can be limited to the tumor volume with minimal normal tissue injury along the entrance track.…”
Section: Proton Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Radiation treatment is a life-saving intervention that can be associated with neurocognitive, emotional, and behavioral sequalae, [2][3][4][5][6][7] although the use of proton radiation treatment (PRT) has yielded more favorable outcomes due to its dose-sparing properties. [8][9][10] Many studies examining the outcomes of PRT revealed cognitive and adaptive functioning in the normal range more than 3 years post-treatment; [11][12][13] however, adaptive functioning challenges at 5 years post-PRT have been observed, with greater vulnerability in survivors treated with craniospinal irradiation (CSI). 12 Studies of psychosocial and executive functioning outcome following PRT in pediatric brain tumor survivors are relatively recent, and require replication to strategically guide intervention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%