Genetic Differentiation and Dispersal in Plants 1985
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-70837-4_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protogyny in Plantago lanceolata populations: an adaptation to pollination by wind?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This report presents the measurement of the genetic structure in a field population and estimates of gene flow in the self-incompatible, windpollinated, perennial, herbacious plant species Plantago lanceolata L. The species shows the typical syndrome of anemophilous species (sensu Faegri and van der Pijl, 1973): reduced flowers with extending anthers, with sticky, feathery stigmas, large amounts of non-sticky pollen grains with a diameter of 20-30 pm (Hammer, 1978;Primack, 1978;Bos et al, 1985). However some populations of the species are also reported to be insect pollinated (Stelleman, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This report presents the measurement of the genetic structure in a field population and estimates of gene flow in the self-incompatible, windpollinated, perennial, herbacious plant species Plantago lanceolata L. The species shows the typical syndrome of anemophilous species (sensu Faegri and van der Pijl, 1973): reduced flowers with extending anthers, with sticky, feathery stigmas, large amounts of non-sticky pollen grains with a diameter of 20-30 pm (Hammer, 1978;Primack, 1978;Bos et al, 1985). However some populations of the species are also reported to be insect pollinated (Stelleman, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the selection effect was discovered during the study, and the intensity of pollination was not accurately controlled during the crosses presented in Tables 1-4, chance variation could be partly responsible for the pattern of variation of the gametophytic selection effect. Alternatively, unknown differences in genetic background, for example with respect to the degree of protogyny (Bos et al, 1985) or the stickiness of pollen (Tonsor, 1985) could play a role.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Differences in root contraction (and in withdrawal of the apical meristem into the ground) cause varying vulnerability of the shoot to treading. In the protogynous flower the style appears first; hereafter the corolla lobes will reflex and the anthers emerge (Bos et al 1985;Fig. major, P. media, P. coronopus and P. lanceolala were subjected to a daily rhythm of mechanical pressure, Blom (1979) found P. lanceolala -the species with the lowest root contraction -to be the one most susceptible to mechanical pressure.…”
Section: General Morphology In Plantagomentioning
confidence: 99%