2020
DOI: 10.36440/recmvz.v18i1.37996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protocolo anestésico para ressecção parcial da parede torácica seguida de reconstrução em cães: relato de dois casos

Abstract: O presente trabalho relata o protocolo anestésico utilizado em dois cães submetidos à cirurgia de ressecção e reconstrução da parede torácica devido a neoplasmas, no Hospital Veterinário Roque Quagliato do Centro Universitário das Faculdades Integradas de Ourinhos, São Paulo. Uma cadela poodle de 10 anos e um cão rottweiler de um ano e três meses foram submetidos à anestesia geral com isofluorano, bloqueio intercostal de, respectivamente, seis e sete espaços intercostais com lidocaína 2% e bupivacaína 0,5% e i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, a regional intercostal block in the transoperative period was carried out. This block has already been mentioned in complex procedures, such as partial resection of the chest wall followed by reconstruction (JULIÃO et al, 2020), mastectomies (SANCHES et al, 2020), or aortic ductal persistence corrective surgery in dogs (VOLKEIS et al, 2020). In all the mentioned procedures, the block has been demonstrated to be efficient and satisfactory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this case, a regional intercostal block in the transoperative period was carried out. This block has already been mentioned in complex procedures, such as partial resection of the chest wall followed by reconstruction (JULIÃO et al, 2020), mastectomies (SANCHES et al, 2020), or aortic ductal persistence corrective surgery in dogs (VOLKEIS et al, 2020). In all the mentioned procedures, the block has been demonstrated to be efficient and satisfactory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%