Protocole non conventionnel de mise en place d’implants transradiculaires. Esquisse d’un changement de paradigme

Davarpanah, Mahdi; Szmukler‐Moncler, Serge; Davarpanah, Keyvan; Rajzbaum, Philippe; Corbière, S. de; Capelle-Ouadah, Nedjoua; Demurashvili, Georgy

doi:10.1016/j.stomax.2012.05.012

Cited by 9 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The implant placement in contact with dental tissue was indicated in three clinical situations: impacted teeth 5 6 7 8 ; ankylosed teeth 9 10 ; and residual roots. 6…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Transdental implants were also used in the cases of impacted teeth. 5 6 7 8 A total of 20 patients were treated with 32 implants placed through impacted canines and premolars. The follow-up was for a period ranging from 6 months to 8 years.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thread tap were used to facilitate implant placement because the walls of the cavity in contact with the dental tissue were rigid. 8…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Implants Placement in Contact with Dental Tissue: A Potential Paradigm Shift? Systematic Literature Review

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to explore the literature for clinical and histological data of an unconventional treatment with implants placement in contact with dental tissue (IPICDT) and to try to clarify its indications and surgical procedure particularities.Relevant publications published until May 2019 on the IPICDT were thoroughly reviewed. Search strategy was developed using a controlled vocabulary combination.Medline’s exploration and manual research identified 397 articles; 15 of these were selected after screening. IPICDT was indicated in three clinical situations: impacted teeth, ankylosed teeth, or residual roots. Clinical and radiological follow-up were satisfied except for implants placed in contact with (and not through) roots. Histological analysis revealed different mineralized tissues formed on the implant surface: cementum on removed implants in human and osteodentin on implants placed in contact with animal teeth dentin and pulp. These findings were described as new concept of implants’ “Mineral integration.”According to this study, the follow-up results of implants placed in contact with roots were controversial. Some implants were stable and others were either removed or kept and disinfected after root extraction because of bacterial infection. However, implants placed through ankylosed or impacted teeth were stable. These findings suggest that the clinicians have to be cautious when applying this unconventional approach. Further studies are recommended to explore its long follow-up. It is also interesting to explore this technique in cases of syndromic dental diseases with several impacted teeth (such as cleidocranial dysplasia; or amelogenesis imperfecta).

show abstract

“…The implant placement in contact with dental tissue was indicated in three clinical situations: impacted teeth 5 6 7 8 ; ankylosed teeth 9 10 ; and residual roots. 6…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Implants Placement in Contact with Dental Tissue: A Potential Paradigm Shift? Systematic Literature Review

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Dental implants at sites of focal high and mixed density osseous lesions: Treatment strategies

Akers

Wagner²,

Vargas³

et al. 2022

Clin Adv Periodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Focused Clinical Question Under what circumstances may a clinician consider dental implant placement at a site exhibiting a focal high or mixed density (HMD) osseous lesion radiologically? Summary Some conditions and pathologic entities exhibiting high and mixed density radiological appearance pose low risk for dental implant failure or complications following implant surgery. However, other lesions represent contraindications to implant placement, and implant surgery at such sites can result in severe morbidity. Conclusion Potential implant sites exhibiting focal HMD osseous lesions/conditions present varying levels of risk. In most cases, optimal management will include advanced imaging of the site, multidisciplinary consultations, and detailed informed consent to assure full understanding of procedural risks, benefits, and complications. Currently, clinical recommendations rely on case reports, opinion, and usual practice (level 3 evidence). The strength of each recommendation provided in this report is categorized as level C.

show abstract

e-Implantology

Pascual¹,

Jérôme²

2017

E-Health Care in Dentistry and Oral Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Protocole non conventionnel de mise en place d’implants transradiculaires. Esquisse d’un changement de paradigme

Cited by 9 publications

References 16 publications

Implants Placement in Contact with Dental Tissue: A Potential Paradigm Shift? Systematic Literature Review

Implants Placement in Contact with Dental Tissue: A Potential Paradigm Shift? Systematic Literature Review

Dental implants at sites of focal high and mixed density osseous lesions: Treatment strategies

e-Implantology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About