2012
DOI: 10.1002/cl2.87
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PROTOCOL: The effects of microcredit on women's control over household spending in developing countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…None-the-less we have stopped short of a full statistical meta-analysis of results in which numerical measures of impacts are combined and have purposefully reported findings using narrative synthesis. Others have gone further and are currently undertaking full statistical meta-analysis of some of this same literature (Vaessen et al, 2010). While the condensing of results in this paper may for some appear to have gone too far, it is inherent within the nature of systematic review methodology and, as such, this paper provides a valuable case study of one way in which this approach is being used in international development.…”
Section: (A) On Microfinancementioning
confidence: 98%
“…None-the-less we have stopped short of a full statistical meta-analysis of results in which numerical measures of impacts are combined and have purposefully reported findings using narrative synthesis. Others have gone further and are currently undertaking full statistical meta-analysis of some of this same literature (Vaessen et al, 2010). While the condensing of results in this paper may for some appear to have gone too far, it is inherent within the nature of systematic review methodology and, as such, this paper provides a valuable case study of one way in which this approach is being used in international development.…”
Section: (A) On Microfinancementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Others cover specific interventions, such as microcredit (e.g., Vaessen et al, 2014), formal banking services (Pande, Cole, Sivasankaran, Bastian, & Wendel, 2012), microenterprise (e.g., Grimm & Paffhausen, 2015), microsavings and microleasing and microinsurance (Cole, Bastian, Vyas, Wendel, & Stein, 2012). Some systematic reviews focus on particular populations, such as Sub-Saharan African recipients (e.g., Stewart, van Rooyen, Dickson, Majoro, & de Wet, 2010), particular methods of providing financial services, such as SHGs (e.g., Brody et al, 2015) or particular outcomes, such as health (e.g., Leatherman, Metcalfe, Geissler, & Dunford, 2012) or empowerment (Brody et al, 2015;Vaessen et al, 2014). The systematic reviews also differ by focus, many covering effectiveness evidence, but others incorporating participant views (e.g., Brody et al, 2015;Peters, Lockwood, Munn, Moola, & Mishra, 2016) and barriers or enablers of uptake and effectiveness (e.g., Panda et al, 2016) including innovations in information and communications technology (e.g., Gurman, Rubin, & Roess, 2012;Jennings & Gagliardi, 2013;Lee et al, 2016;Sondaal et al, 2015).…”
Section: Why It Is Important To Do the Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, many of the meta-studies in our study sample have adopted a narrative synthesis approach to deal with the methodological diversity of their included primary studies (e.g., Duvendack et al, 2011;Stewart et al, 2010Stewart et al, , 2012. In very few cases, a combination of qualitative and quantitative synthesis approaches was found (e.g., Vaessen et al, 2014). In very few cases, a combination of qualitative and quantitative synthesis approaches was found (e.g., Vaessen et al, 2014).…”
Section: Data Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations