2018
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protocol of economic evaluation and equity impact analysis of mHealth and community groups for prevention and control of diabetes in rural Bangladesh in a three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial

Abstract: IntroductionType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide, generating substantial economic burden for people with diabetes and their families, and to health systems and national economies. Bangladesh has one of the largest numbers of adults with diabetes in the South Asian region. This paper describes the planned economic evaluation of a three-arm cluster randomised control trial of mHealth and community mobilisation interventions to prevent and control T2DM and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All costs were adjusted for inflation, discounted at 3% per year, and converted to 2018 international dollars (INT$). We calculated DALYs averted using the Global Burden of Disease study approach (appendix);23, 24 a detailed description of the economic evaluation methodology is presented elsewhere 25 . Since our interventions and evaluation of them were population based (as opposed to an individual-level study) and, for the most part, we did not follow up the same individuals from baseline to end of study, we were not able to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All costs were adjusted for inflation, discounted at 3% per year, and converted to 2018 international dollars (INT$). We calculated DALYs averted using the Global Burden of Disease study approach (appendix);23, 24 a detailed description of the economic evaluation methodology is presented elsewhere 25 . Since our interventions and evaluation of them were population based (as opposed to an individual-level study) and, for the most part, we did not follow up the same individuals from baseline to end of study, we were not able to estimate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%