2022
DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PROTOCOL: Group‐based community interventions to support the social reintegration of marginalised adults with mental illness

Abstract: This is the protocol for a Campbell systematic review. The main objective is to explore the general efficacy of group‐based community interventions aimed at supporting marginalised adults with mental illness and related problems on outcomes such as problem behaviour, subjective well‐being, homelessness, poverty and employment. Furthermore, the objective is to explore the potential advantages/disadvantages of using a group‐based versus an individual intervention when targeting specific problems or when using sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As there is no critical level of risk within the RoB 2 tool, any RCTs judged as too problematic to provide useful evidence of the intervention will be excluded due to a critical risk of bias. As such, we will add a critical level of risk of bias to the RoB 2, similar to past reviews (Dalgaard et al, 2022 ). Consistent with this approach (Dalgaard et al, 2022 ), if a high risk of bias is determined in multiple domains with the RoB 2 or ROBINS‐I tool then this may lead to the study being deemed as at a critical risk of bias, and excluded from the meta‐analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As there is no critical level of risk within the RoB 2 tool, any RCTs judged as too problematic to provide useful evidence of the intervention will be excluded due to a critical risk of bias. As such, we will add a critical level of risk of bias to the RoB 2, similar to past reviews (Dalgaard et al, 2022 ). Consistent with this approach (Dalgaard et al, 2022 ), if a high risk of bias is determined in multiple domains with the RoB 2 or ROBINS‐I tool then this may lead to the study being deemed as at a critical risk of bias, and excluded from the meta‐analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, we will add a critical level of risk of bias to the RoB 2, similar to past reviews (Dalgaard et al, 2022 ). Consistent with this approach (Dalgaard et al, 2022 ), if a high risk of bias is determined in multiple domains with the RoB 2 or ROBINS‐I tool then this may lead to the study being deemed as at a critical risk of bias, and excluded from the meta‐analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have discussed the social reintegration of released inmates re-entering society who were jailed for sexual offenses (McAlinden, 2010), mental illness (Dalgaard et al, 2022), and drug addiction (Maruna et al, 2013), and the likelihood of ex-inmates reoffending. Findings have suggested that comprehensive intervention through various stakeholders' collaboration is critical to lowering the possibility of recidivism.…”
Section: Social Reintegration In a Deradicalisation Program By Diseng...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mitigating the socioeconomic determinants that increase the risk for the above difficulties in adolescents and youth (as identified in the United Nations’ SGDs) could be achieved through integrated interventions. These interventions would work closely with families and communities in the promotion of effective and accessible basic provision including education and resources to empower the population in decision-making and targeting competencies such as developmet of self-efficacy to potentially bridge their psychological, economic, sexual and reproductive health-related gaps 11–18…”
Section: How Do We Address Their Unmet Needs and Compromised Mental S...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These interventions would work closely with families and communities in the promotion of effective and accessible basic provision including education and resources to empower the population in decisionmaking and targeting competencies such as developmet of self-efficacy to potentially bridge their psychological, economic, sexual and reproductive health-related gaps. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]…”
Section: Who Is Left Behind?mentioning
confidence: 99%