Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2017.02.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protocol for the recovery and detection of Escherichia coli in environmental water samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the proposed procedure, it is possible to monitor indirectly the presence and distribution of E. coli in seawater. Compared to other technologies developed for the rapid detection of bacteria in recreational waters, the developed protocol offers also the advantages of working with low volumes of sample, disposable microplates, and simple instrumentation, therefore it is cheaper than other commercial diagnostic kits for E. coli detection based on molecular approaches [22][23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the proposed procedure, it is possible to monitor indirectly the presence and distribution of E. coli in seawater. Compared to other technologies developed for the rapid detection of bacteria in recreational waters, the developed protocol offers also the advantages of working with low volumes of sample, disposable microplates, and simple instrumentation, therefore it is cheaper than other commercial diagnostic kits for E. coli detection based on molecular approaches [22][23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While high-throughput developments enhance their processing, the processes remain lengthy because samples are collected and sent to laboratories for results to be provided within 18-24 h. This reduces effectiveness and contributes to reactive management when high-concentration events occur [22,39,41,42]. Unreliability is another issue, as CBM are often unable to provide reliable analyses of samples when the samples contain several different bacterial organisms or sediment levels such as in marine waters with high sediment levels, often returning false negatives and underestimations when the concentration of E. coli is low [22,43,44]. As a result, other detection techniques must be deployed to analyse complex samples [39,45,46].…”
Section: Culture-based Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was confirmed by Guo et al [32] when their CBM tests found that only <3% of the total bacterial population in their water sample was culturable. Additionally, bacterial load is often underestimated because only viable organisms are detected, excluding VBNC [22,44].…”
Section: Culture-based Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations