2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-6129-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protocol for the IDEAL-2 longitudinal study: following the experiences of people with dementia and their primary carers to understand what contributes to living well with dementia and enhances active life

Abstract: BackgroundThere is a major need for longitudinal research examining the experiences of people with dementia and their primary carers, as relatively little is known about how the factors associated with capability to ‘live well’ vary over time. The main aim of the IDEAL-2 study is to investigate how and why, over time, people with dementia and their primary carers might vary in their capability to live well with dementia, whilst exploring both their use of health and care services and their unmet needs.MethodsI… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Improving the experience of Dementia and Enhancing Active Life (IDEAL) programme is a 9-year longitudinal cohort study investigating influences on living well with dementia. 25,26 This paper presents crosssectional data from version 2.0 of the IDEAL dataset for initial assessments conducted between July 2014 and August 2016. The cohort at baseline included 1547 participants with dementia together with 1283 informants, mostly spouses/partners.…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Improving the experience of Dementia and Enhancing Active Life (IDEAL) programme is a 9-year longitudinal cohort study investigating influences on living well with dementia. 25,26 This paper presents crosssectional data from version 2.0 of the IDEAL dataset for initial assessments conducted between July 2014 and August 2016. The cohort at baseline included 1547 participants with dementia together with 1283 informants, mostly spouses/partners.…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative FAQ cut-off score of 9 has been recommended as indicative of impairment 44 and is used primarily in North America; 50 thus, level 3 included those who scored 6 to 9. The remaining three groups reflect equal score ranges comprising 8 points each: level 4 (10-17), level 5 (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25), and level 6 (26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33). Participants with dementia who had no informant participating in the study were included in the analyses using FAQ-S ratings but not in the analyses using FAQ-I ratings.…”
Section: Functional Abilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We used baseline data from the Improving the experience of Dementia and Enhancing Active Life (IDEAL) program [18,19] (data set version 2.0), following yearly for up to 6 years a cohort of people with mild-to-moderate dementia from baseline (hereafter participants) and, where available, a primary carer (relative/friend providing unpaid support to the participant; hereafter carers) [18]. The first phase of IDEAL, covering the first three time points, was approved by Wales Research Ethics Committee 5 (13/WA/0405) and the Ethics Committee of the School of Psychology, Bangor University (reference 2014-11684) and is registered with the UK Clinical Research Network (16593).…”
Section: Design and Samplementioning
confidence: 99%