Protocol for the CONNECT Study: A National Database and Prospective Follow-Up Study of Forensic Mental Health Patients in Germany

Abstract

In Germany, the most frequently used legal section to order forensic mental health treatment is § 63 of the Penal Code (Strafgesetzbuch; StGB). This disposition is primarily aimed at individuals with major mental illnesses who are not fully responsible for a criminal act they committed. Despite evaluation and follow-up studies being conducted within individual hospitals or federal states we lack key epidemiological data on this patient group across the whole country. The present study aims to fill this gap by conducting an annual survey of all eligible forensic mental health hospitals to develop a database of basic clinical, legal and demographic data. Staff at participating hospitals will complete an online survey answering questions about individual patients using routinely collected hospital records. Over the duration of the study, eight-and-a-half years, we aim to collect data on approximately N = 6,450 patients. Alongside important clinical data, we will use official reconviction data at 3- and 6-year follow-ups to investigate the number and types of crimes committed by discharged patients. We aim to extend the scientific literature on factors associated with reconviction in the Risk-Needs-Responsivity model by also measuring the extent to which treatment engagement and programme completion during care predicts reconviction. This study protocol describes the background and theoretical framework for this study, its methods of data collection and analysis, and steps taken to ensure compliance with ethical and data protection principles.

Predicting violence in female forensic inpatients with substance use disorders – the utility of a gender-responsive assessment

“…In this context, successful treatment concerns the achievement of individual therapeutic aims that serve the overarching goal of minimizing the patients’ recidivism risk while facilitating their successful reintegration into society. Commonly, such objectives entail abstinence from substances, alleviation of psychiatric symptoms, enhanced social functioning, insight into mental disorder and gradual reduction of the levels of restriction, eventually leading to dismissal from forensic psychiatric treatment ( 40 ).…”

Offending behaviour and mental ill-health among young people: Reducing recidivism requires integration with youth mental health care

“…Urgent innovation is needed to quantify and describe the full extent of the challenges facing us and to develop novel and effective interventions. Prospective studies incorporating long-term post-release follow-up of justiceinvolved youth will contribute to an improved understanding of reconviction [27] and subsequent refinement of leading explanatory forensic models such as Risk-Need-Responsivity [28]. In the UK, program and policy progress has been made based on the Child First, Offender Second [29] approach, and we emphasise that models prioritising the best interests of youth offenders are urgently needed (i.e.…”

Availability of opioid agonist treatment and critical incidents in Forensic Clinics for Dependency Diseases in Germany

“…While comprehensive data describing differences in forensic psychiatric care, admission numbers over time, and legal frameworks in European countries ( 8 – 10 ) exist, data on specific FCDD or available treatment options for (comorbid) substance abuse disorders in forensic psychiatry are lacking on a national and on an international level ( 11 , 12 ). After 30 years of deinstitutionalization with a reduction of general psychiatric bed capacity, a trend toward reinstitutionalization with higher admission rates into forensic psychiatric care is evident ( 13 ).…”