Encyclopedia of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology 2019
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-809633-8.20477-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protocol for Protein Structure Modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We then calculated query coverage between the six shortlisted templates and OR1A2. Query coverage is an important factor to be considered for homology modelling ( Jabeen et al., 2019b ). Based on query coverage assessment (Supporting information: Table S4 ), we shortlisted four templates: bovine rhodopsin (PDBID: 1U19 ) ( Crasto, 2010 ), beta-2 adrenergic receptor (PDBID: 2RH1 ) ( Wacker et al., 2017 ), adenosine receptor A2a (PDBID: 5IU4 ) ( Wolf and Grünewald, 2015 ) and muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2 (PDBID: 5ZKC ) ( Vaidehi and Bhattacharya, 2016 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We then calculated query coverage between the six shortlisted templates and OR1A2. Query coverage is an important factor to be considered for homology modelling ( Jabeen et al., 2019b ). Based on query coverage assessment (Supporting information: Table S4 ), we shortlisted four templates: bovine rhodopsin (PDBID: 1U19 ) ( Crasto, 2010 ), beta-2 adrenergic receptor (PDBID: 2RH1 ) ( Wacker et al., 2017 ), adenosine receptor A2a (PDBID: 5IU4 ) ( Wolf and Grünewald, 2015 ) and muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M2 (PDBID: 5ZKC ) ( Vaidehi and Bhattacharya, 2016 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second stage, we have used structure-based virtual screening (SBVS) using a homology model of OR1A2 to select the metabolites obtained through APF screening. Our earlier homology modelling approach for GPCRs ( Jabeen et al., 2019b ) has been extended to ORs in the current study, to select the bovine rhodopsin template, rigorously identified by a biophysical approach proposed here, based on multiple parameters including sequence identity, query coverage, resolution, hydrophobicity, ligand profile, and binding site comparison. The top five ligands from SBVS were subjected to molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, with four putative ligands identified, with greater binding affinity than the control ligand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular dynamics simulations are performed for energy minimizations of the wild-type and mutant drug targets obtaining the most stable protein structures; standalone programs such as GROMACS and Amber are used for performing the task ( Singh et al, 2017 ; Zhang et al, 2019 ). In computational chemistry, energy minimizations which may also be referred to as geometry optimization entail the exploration of the conformational space for a collection of atoms to find a proper molecular arrangement in space which is energy favorable and stable; it is also referred to as the global energy minimum ( Jabeen et al, 2019 ). The resultant structures are then subjected to molecular docking, where the position of the ligand when bound to a protein receptor is predicted for the drug’s wild type and mutated targets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bio-GATS provides a complete alignment that was used to build a 3-D structural model for SBVS using Modeller 9.18 ( Webb and Sali, 2017 ) by a previously established protocol for GPCR homology modeling ( Jabeen et al, 2019b ). The sequence alignment between the target and the template can be manually adjusted using MEGA7 ( Kumar et al, 2016 ) by tethering center residues, class A GPCR conserved motifs, and cysteine residues forming a disulphide bridge.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%