2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protocol for generation of 3D bone marrow surrogate microenvironments in a rotary cell culture system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 5 To evaluate the effect of defactinib in the presence of leukaemia‐stroma interactions, we exploited the traditional 2D culture, thus seeding CLL cells in the presence of HS5 cells (4 cases), treating with 4 μM defactinib and collecting them after 48 h for flow cytometry analysis, where we used the Annexin V‐PI Kit to evaluate cell death and we could not detect any significant protective effect at this concentration and time point (Figure S1 A). To test the ability of defactinib to mobilize CLL cells we took advantage of our established 3D in vitro model with a RCCS™ bioreactor, 25 , 32 which allowed us to study the mobilization and retention effects of defactinib in a scaffold in dynamic conditions ensured by the rotating vessels. The Spongostan™ scaffolds, made of gelatine, have a structure similar to the trabecular bone in the BM and they were populated with HS5 and CLL cells ( n = 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 5 To evaluate the effect of defactinib in the presence of leukaemia‐stroma interactions, we exploited the traditional 2D culture, thus seeding CLL cells in the presence of HS5 cells (4 cases), treating with 4 μM defactinib and collecting them after 48 h for flow cytometry analysis, where we used the Annexin V‐PI Kit to evaluate cell death and we could not detect any significant protective effect at this concentration and time point (Figure S1 A). To test the ability of defactinib to mobilize CLL cells we took advantage of our established 3D in vitro model with a RCCS™ bioreactor, 25 , 32 which allowed us to study the mobilization and retention effects of defactinib in a scaffold in dynamic conditions ensured by the rotating vessels. The Spongostan™ scaffolds, made of gelatine, have a structure similar to the trabecular bone in the BM and they were populated with HS5 and CLL cells ( n = 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D scaffolds were populated according to protocol described by Belloni et al [ 19 ] and adapted to MM cells growth in static conditions. Briefly, scaffold discs were cut from SpongostanTM sheets (Cod.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…66 We recently demonstrated the feasibility of recreating a surrogate 3D MM and CLL microenvironment able to reproduce the functional interactions of the native BM. 20,50,67 We developed a robust technology based on the integrated use of cell-repopulated scaffolds (BM stromal cells) and the microgravity RCCS bioreactor. This system provides a balance between increased mass transfer and reduced shear stress, and this dynamic bioreactor generates optimal conditions for long-term ex vivo maintenance of tissue explants.…”
Section: Advantages Of Dynamic Culturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recently demonstrated the feasibility of recreating a surrogate 3D MM and CLL microenvironment able to reproduce the functional interactions of the native BM 20 , 50 , 67 . We developed a robust technology based on the integrated use of cell‐repopulated scaffolds (BM stromal cells) and the microgravity RCCS bioreactor.…”
Section: Advantages Of Dynamic Culturesmentioning
confidence: 99%