2019
DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protocol for a multicentre randomized clinical trial comparing oncological outcomes of D2 versus D3 lymph node dissection in colonic cancer (COLD trial)

Abstract: Background The extent of lymph node dissection in colonic cancer surgery remains arguable, and evidence from RCTs regarding extended lymph node dissection outcomes is lacking. This study aimed to compare the long‐term results of D3 lymph node dissection with those of D2 dissection. Methods This is a multicentre RCT. The aim is to enrol 768 patients with primary colonic cancer assigned randomly to D2 or D3 lymph node dissection. The trial is assessing the superiority of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, two prospective randomized studies, RELARC and COLD, are ongoing and particularly oncologic results are expected to give a more decisive contribution to this pending and controversial issue [ 54 , 57 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, two prospective randomized studies, RELARC and COLD, are ongoing and particularly oncologic results are expected to give a more decisive contribution to this pending and controversial issue [ 54 , 57 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b Overall survival for robotic CME for colon cancer over standard hemicolectomy. There are a few studies in progress that may provide an answer in the future [23][24][25][26]. Meta-analysis of cohort studies has shown benefit of CME with reduced local recurrence and improved survival [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, long-term survival/diseasefree recurrence data from these are unavailable. [13][14][15][16] One issue with these trials is that participating surgeons are normally highly skilled in D3 lymphadenectomy, and as such their D2 lymphadenectomies will likely be of a higher standard than that which most people receive. The latter statement is based on the finding (from numerous studies) that significant lengths of the vessels remain in situ post cancer resection (average of 3-4 cm have been reported) and are indicative of a suboptimal D2 lymphadenectomy.…”
Section: Central Vessel Ligation and D3 Lymphadenectomymentioning
confidence: 99%