Protocol for a Delphi consensus exercise to identify a core set of criteria for selecting health related outcome measures (HROM) to be used in primary health care

Abstract

BackgroundPromoting the collection and use of health related outcome measures (HROM) in daily practice has long been a goal for improving and assessing the effectiveness of care provided to patients. However, there has been a lack of consensus on what criteria to use to select outcomes or instruments, particularly in the context of primary health care settings where patients present with multiple concurrent health conditions and interventions are whole-health and person-focused. The purpose of this proposed study is to undertake a formal consensus exercise to establish criteria for selecting HROM (including patient-reported (PRO or PROM), observer-reported (ObsR)), clinician-reported (ClinRO) and performance related outcomes (PerfO) for use in shared decision-making, or in assessing, screening or monitoring health status in primary health care settings.MethodsA Delphi consensus online survey will be developed. Criteria for the Delphi panel participants to consider were selected from a targeted literature search. These initial criteria (n = 35) were grouped into four categories within which items will be presented in the Delphi survey, with the option to suggest additional items. Panel members invited to participate will include primary health care practitioners and administrators, policy-makers, researchers, and experts in HROM development; patients will be excluded. Standard Delphi methodology will be employed with an expectation of at least 3 rounds to achieve consensus (75% agreement). As the final list of criteria for selecting HROM emerges, panel members will be asked to provide opinions about potential weighting of items. The Delphi survey was approved by the Ethics Committee in the Faculty of Health Sciences at McMaster University.DiscussionPrevious literature establishing criteria for selecting HROM were developed with a focus on patient reported outcomes, psychological/ behavioural outcomes or outcomes for minimum core outcome sets in clinical trials. Although helpful, these criteria may not be applicable and feasible for application in a primary health care context where patients with multi-morbidity and complex interventions are typical and the constraints of providing health services differ from those in research studies. The findings from this Delphi consensus study will address a gap for establishing consensus on criteria for selecting HROM for use across primary health care settings.

Organization Development Values From a Future-Oriented Perspective: An International Delphi Study

“…In this study, we adopted the 75% threshold to indicate the state of consensus. This 75% threshold aligns with other studies indicating consensus (e.g., Santaguida et al, 2018;Yoon et al, 2019). We employed a 5-point scale (1 = not valid at all; 2 = partially invalid; 3 = neutral; 4 = partially valid; 5 = very valid) for validity rating for the values.…”

Combining volunteers and primary care teamwork to support health goals and needs of older adults: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial

“…Structured surveys were chosen if they were valid, reliable, feasible and free of cost. 28 The volunteers sent, securely and electronically, a report summarizing patients' goals, alerts, key issues and observations to the primary care electronic medical record, to the attention of an intake and case conferencing interprofessional "huddle" team at the clinics. These interprofessional teams reviewed the reports and then generated, prioritized and acted upon plans of care for how the team (including non-huddle-team members), community agencies and volunteers could address clients' goals and health issues, with iterative follow-up.…”

An International Delphi Survey on Exercise Priorities in CKD

“…The number of panel participants varies widely, and the optimal panel size is not established. 12 We aimed for 15 to 20 participants per panel with a total of 60 to 80 participants.…”