Protocol-developing meta-ethnography reporting guidelines (eMERGe)

Abstract

BackgroundDesigning and implementing high-quality health care services and interventions requires robustly synthesised evidence. Syntheses of qualitative research studies can provide evidence of patients’ experiences of health conditions; intervention feasibility, appropriateness and acceptability to patients; and advance understanding of health care issues. The unique, interpretive, theory-based meta-ethnography synthesis approach is suited to conveying patients’ views and developing theory to inform service design and delivery. However, meta-ethnography reporting is often poor quality, which discourages trust in, and use of, meta-ethnography findings. Users of evidence syntheses require reports that clearly articulate analytical processes and findings. Tailored research reporting guidelines can raise reporting standards but none exists for meta-ethnography. This study aims to create an evidence-based meta-ethnography reporting guideline articulating the methodological standards and depth of reporting required to improve reporting quality.Methods/designThe mixed-methods design of this National Institute of Health Research-funded study (http://www.stir.ac.uk/emerge/) follows good practice in research reporting guideline development comprising: (1) a methodological systematic review (PROSPERO registration: CRD42015024709) to identify recommendations and guidance in conducting/reporting meta-ethnography; (2) a review and audit of published meta-ethnographies to identify good practice principles and develop standards in conduct/reporting; (3) an online workshop and Delphi studies to agree guideline content with 45 international qualitative synthesis experts and 45 other stakeholders including patients; (4) development and wide dissemination of the guideline and its accompanying detailed explanatory document, a report template for National Institute of Health Research commissioned meta-ethnographies, and training materials on guideline use.DiscussionMeta-ethnography, devised in the field of education, is now used widely in other disciplines. Methodological advances relevant to meta-ethnography conduct exist. The extent of discipline-specific adaptations of meta-ethnography and the fit of any adaptions with the underpinning philosophy of meta-ethnography require investigation. Well-reported meta-ethnography findings could inform clinical decision-making. A bespoke meta-ethnography reporting guideline is needed to improve reporting quality, but to be effective potential users must know it exists, trust it and use it. Therefore, a rigorous study has been designed to develop and promote a guideline. By raising reporting quality, the guideline will maximise the likelihood that high-quality meta-ethnographies will contribute robust evidence to improve health care and patient outcomes.

Home palliative care works: but how? A meta-ethnography of the experiences of patients and family caregivers

“…Synthesising the qualitative evidence of the experiences of patients and family caregivers with home palliative care services will shed light on the role of the different components of the intervention 12. Albeit challenging, the identification of these key components, together with an understanding of how they influence the experiences of patients and families, could be useful to research, by informing the design of interventions to be tested in the future.…”

Improving reporting of meta‐ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidance

“…The methods used to develop the eMERGe meta‐ethnography reporting guidance followed a rigorous approach consistent with, but exceeding, good practice recommendations (Moher, Schulz, Simera, & Altman, ) and were published in a protocol (France et al., ). The research questions were: What are the existing recommendations and guidance for conducting and reporting each process in a meta‐ethnography and why?…”

Bladder management experiences among people living with neurologic disease: A systematic review and meta‐synthesis of qualitative research

“…After the papers were read multiple times, two authors manually reviewed, line‐by‐line, the results sections to identify concepts. A meta‐ethnography technique was used for data analysis, which is a widely used approach in qualitative synthesis that is designed to summarize patient views and experiences . The goal is to produce summary interpretations and identify overarching concepts across different study settings and contexts.…”

“…The use of qualitative research has been recognized as an essential step when creating and understanding patient reported QOL, and the different qualitative methodologies have been well described . A meta‐ethnography (or meta‐synthesis) takes a body of qualitative research and analyses similarities among the studies (analogous to a traditional quantitative meta‐analysis) …”