1982
DOI: 10.1038/295499a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protochordate allorecognition is controlled by a MHC-like gene system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
247
0
4

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 405 publications
(257 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
247
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The apparent absence of MHC class I or class II molecules in species that occupy positions below the phylogenetic level of jawed vertebrates 38 confounds efforts to assign the ancestral form of the conventional adaptive immune receptors as being either BCR-or TCR-like and might present an intractable problem. Notably, despite the apparent absence of MHC molecules, Botryllus schlosseri (a colonial protochordate) 142 and Hydractinia species (cnidarians; which are invertebrates) 143,144 show HISTOCOMPATIBILITY REACTIONS (that is, allotransplantation reactions) through a process known as fusibility, which protects the germline by inhibiting chimerism and/or parasitism 145 . Fusibility is determined by a single Mendelian trait and, in Botryllus schlosseri 146 , is mediated by highly polymorphic cell-surface receptors that contain immunoglobulin-superfamily and epidermal-growth-factor domains that are encoded at a single locus 147 .…”
Section: Box 1 Alternative Mediators Of Histocompatibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apparent absence of MHC class I or class II molecules in species that occupy positions below the phylogenetic level of jawed vertebrates 38 confounds efforts to assign the ancestral form of the conventional adaptive immune receptors as being either BCR-or TCR-like and might present an intractable problem. Notably, despite the apparent absence of MHC molecules, Botryllus schlosseri (a colonial protochordate) 142 and Hydractinia species (cnidarians; which are invertebrates) 143,144 show HISTOCOMPATIBILITY REACTIONS (that is, allotransplantation reactions) through a process known as fusibility, which protects the germline by inhibiting chimerism and/or parasitism 145 . Fusibility is determined by a single Mendelian trait and, in Botryllus schlosseri 146 , is mediated by highly polymorphic cell-surface receptors that contain immunoglobulin-superfamily and epidermal-growth-factor domains that are encoded at a single locus 147 .…”
Section: Box 1 Alternative Mediators Of Histocompatibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We showed that this primitive immune response was controlled by a single highly polymorphic locus or haplotype (177). The rules of fusion or rejection follow those of NK recognition of self, wherein sharing a single allele halts the effector immune reactions that occur between zooids or colonies that do not share an allele at the locus (177)(178)(179)(180).…”
Section: Cancer Stem Cells and The Therapeutics That Come From Them: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rejecting colonies, however, did not became somatic or germline chimeras (181). Therefore we proposed that clonal progression of stem cell competitive behaviors was a natural evolution, that germline stem cells were units of natural selection, and that the polymorphic histocompatibility in this species limited predatory germline stem cells from invading anything but histocompatible kin, insofar as the histocompatibility locus had hundreds of alleles, and the probability that anything but kin would share an allele was very low (166,177). We proposed that the ultimate extension of clonal stem cell competitions was cancer and that this limitation of fusion to kin protected both the diversity and the viability of the species (161,183,184).…”
Section: Cancer Stem Cells and The Therapeutics That Come From Them: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-non-self discrimination and other recognition systems, controlled by a highly polymorphic locus, are found in a wide range of organisms. Allorecognition is widespread and is integral to the animal immune response (Hughes 2002 ), fusion histocompatibility in lower animals (Scofi eld et al 1982 ;De Tomaso et al 2005 ;Nyholm et al 2006 ), vegetative incompatibility in fungi (Glass et al 2000 ), disease resistance in plants (Dangl and Jones 2001 ), and selfincompatibility (SI) systems found in many fl owering plants (Takayama and Isogai 2005 ;Franklin-Tong 2008 ). Parallels between nonanalogous recognition systems were recognized, and their importance appreciated, many years ago (Burnet 1971 ), long before the molecular basis of these systems were elucidated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%