2020
DOI: 10.1017/s0890060420000414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Protobooth: gathering and analyzing data on prototyping in early-stage engineering design projects by digitally capturing physical prototypes

Abstract: Aiming to help researchers capture output from the early stages of engineering design projects, this article presents a new research tool for digitally capturing physical prototypes. The motivation for this work is to collect observations that can aid in understanding prototyping in the early stages of engineering design projects, and this article investigates if and how digital capture of physical prototypes can be used for this purpose. Early-stage prototypes are usually rough and of low fidelity and are thu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, attempts have been made to aid the process of revision control during a prototyping process through the development of tools for capturing digital representations of each iteration of a prototype. Work in this area has, to date, focussed on capturing 2D images of prototypes to produce a 'snapshot' of each iteration (Barhoush et al, 2019;Erichsen et al, 2020). Whilst 2D representations can certainly provide an indication of a physical artefact's design, their efficacy in communicating the intricacies of each iteration is limited by their inability to capture and convey the detailed geometry of a physical artefact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, attempts have been made to aid the process of revision control during a prototyping process through the development of tools for capturing digital representations of each iteration of a prototype. Work in this area has, to date, focussed on capturing 2D images of prototypes to produce a 'snapshot' of each iteration (Barhoush et al, 2019;Erichsen et al, 2020). Whilst 2D representations can certainly provide an indication of a physical artefact's design, their efficacy in communicating the intricacies of each iteration is limited by their inability to capture and convey the detailed geometry of a physical artefact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On presenting an RFID card to a reader mounted on Protobooth, the cameras would automatically snap two photos, one for each camera mounted on the booth. Erichsen et al (2021) further improved the booth design by increasing the number of cameras used to capture prototypes to seven. Figure 1 shows the updated version of Protobooth developed by Erichsen et al (2021).…”
Section: Protoboothmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it does not indicate what an actual prototyping process looks like in detail. The visualisation of concrete prototyping processes shows that these are more complex, branched, and intertwined than it appears from the PfX framework (Erichsen et al, 2020;. The prototyping process is defined by the goals and restrictions coming from the overarching product development process.…”
Section: Navigating the Prototyping Processmentioning
confidence: 99%