2003
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkg541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PROTINFO: secondary and tertiary protein structure prediction

Abstract: Information about the secondary and tertiary structure of a protein sequence can greatly assist biologists in the generation and testing of hypotheses, as well as design of experiments. The PROTINFO server enables users to submit a protein sequence and request a prediction of the three-dimensional (tertiary) structure based on comparative modeling, fold generation and de novo methods developed by the authors. In addition, users can submit NMR chemical shift data and request protein secondary structure assignme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Structural modeling of AMO was performed with the comparative modeling protocol on the PROTINFO structure prediction server (http://protinfo.compbio.washington.edu) using the particulate methane monooxygenase crystal structure as a template (28). This comparative modeling protocol has been shown to work well in the CASP protein structure prediction experiments (18,19). Initial models were constructed using a minimum perturbation approach that aims to preserve as much information as possible from the template structure solved by X-ray crystallography.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural modeling of AMO was performed with the comparative modeling protocol on the PROTINFO structure prediction server (http://protinfo.compbio.washington.edu) using the particulate methane monooxygenase crystal structure as a template (28). This comparative modeling protocol has been shown to work well in the CASP protein structure prediction experiments (18,19). Initial models were constructed using a minimum perturbation approach that aims to preserve as much information as possible from the template structure solved by X-ray crystallography.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suggest that the region including the majority of FlgG* mutations (residues 52-66, drawn in a green oval) are located near the top of the FlgG subunit where it interacts with residues G183 and S197, located at the bottom of the structure during FlgG polymerization. A three-dimensional model of FlgG was constructed using the comparative modeling module of the Protinfo server (http://protinfo.compbio.washington.edu), which has been shown to work well in the CASP protein structure prediction experiments (Hung and Samudrala 2003;Hung et al 2005). The structure of FlgE was used as a template for the modeling the FlgG sequence excluding the N-and C-terminal insertions (Samatey et al 2004).…”
Section: Rod Length Control Is Required For Normal P-and L-ring Formamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A three-dimensional model of the flgG was constructed using the comparative modeling module of the Protinfo server (http:// protinfo.compbio.washington.edu), which has been shown to work well in the CASP protein structure prediction experiments (Hung and Samudrala 2003;Hung et al 2005). The structure of FlgE was used as a template for the modeling the flgG sequence excluding the N-and C-terminal insertions (Samatey et al 2004).…”
Section: Flgg Structure Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first approach, for each protein sequence in the database of the solved protein structures, we use an ab initio conformational space sampling protocol to generate 10 decoy structures, as a result yielding a total of 3150 · 10 = 31 500 decoy structures (hereafter denoted as the database of decoy structures). The ab initio conformational space sampling protocol consists of a Monte-Carlo method with simulated annealing procedure, with move set based on the standard fragment replacement scheme, namely, the existing conformation of three consecutive residues at a random position is replaced by the torsion values of three residues with identical sequence from an experimentally determined structure (Simons et al, 1997;Hung and Samudrala, 2003). The energy function used to generate the decoys is a combination of the all-atom distance-dependent function, a hydrophobic compactness function and a bad contacts function (Samudrala et al, 1999;Samudrala and Levitt, 2002).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%