2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10916-018-0972-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteomics Versus Clinical Data and Stochastic Local Search Based Feature Selection for Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients’ Classification

Abstract: The use of data issued from high throughput technologies in drug target problems is widely widespread during the last decades. This study proposes a meta-heuristic framework using stochastic local search (SLS) combined with random forest (RF) where the aim is to specify the most important genes and proteins leading to the best classification of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) patients. First we use a stochastic local search meta-heuristic as a feature selection technique to select the most significant proteins to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ganggayah et al showed that the RF algorithm produced slightly better accuracy (82.7%), in comparison to other evaluated algorithms in predicting factors for survival of breast cancer patients [35]. Chebouba et al proposed to use a stochastic local search meta-heuristic as a feature selection method combined with a random forest classifier to classify AML patients' response to treatment [36]. They used BAC and the AUC scores as evaluation criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ganggayah et al showed that the RF algorithm produced slightly better accuracy (82.7%), in comparison to other evaluated algorithms in predicting factors for survival of breast cancer patients [35]. Chebouba et al proposed to use a stochastic local search meta-heuristic as a feature selection method combined with a random forest classifier to classify AML patients' response to treatment [36]. They used BAC and the AUC scores as evaluation criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, many studies have employed techniques such as principal component analysis as a filter to identify any features that do not bring any important information to the classification process [ 115 ] to enhance detection accuracy. Similarly, Chebouba et al [ 32 ] used a meta-heuristic stochastic local search technique to select the most important genes and proteins to be used in the RF-based classification of patients with AML.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values, n (%) Pathway stage [1,6,7,29,38,40,41,50,51,53,55,64,69,82,92,94,96,[99][100][101][102]105,117,118,136,143,144] 27 (20.6) Prediction [3,10,28,30,[32][33][34]36,[44][45][46]57,58,61,66,71,72,[76][77][78]80,83,85,89,91,…”
Section: Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of targetable mutations, these drug sensitivity screenings can provide treatment options rather than genetic abnormalities. However, HDS screening of anticancer drugs has not yet been generally applied in clinical practice for ALL patients, and it has great potential in personalized treatment, particularly in drug target problems for chemo-resistance groups (173). By performing HDS screening, we can analyze and determine optimal individual dosages combined with or without targeted drugs, which improves treatment efficacy while reducing or avoiding toxicity (174)(175)(176).…”
Section: High-throughput Drug Sensitivity Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%