2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12014-022-09369-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteomics-based evaluation of the mechanism underlying vascular injury via DNA interstrand crosslinks, glutathione perturbation, mitogen-activated protein kinase, and Wnt and ErbB signaling pathways induced by crotonaldehyde

Abstract: Crotonaldehyde (CRA)—one of the major environmental pollutants from tobacco smoke and industrial pollution—is associated with vascular injury (VI). We used proteomics to systematically characterize the presently unclear molecular mechanism of VI and to identify new related targets or signaling pathways after exposure to CRA. Cell survival assays were used to assess DNA damage, whereas oxidative stress was determined using colorimetric assays and by quantitative fluorescence study; additionally, cyclooxygenase-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 70 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the HMPMA, as the metabolites of crotonaldehyde, was firstly found to be positively associated with RA. The major source of crotonaldehyde is tobacco smoke ( 45 ), and it was reported that the crotonaldehyde exposure could result in vascular injury through Wnt and ErbB signaling pathways ( 46 ). While little is known about the effect of crotonaldehyde exposure on RA incidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the HMPMA, as the metabolites of crotonaldehyde, was firstly found to be positively associated with RA. The major source of crotonaldehyde is tobacco smoke ( 45 ), and it was reported that the crotonaldehyde exposure could result in vascular injury through Wnt and ErbB signaling pathways ( 46 ). While little is known about the effect of crotonaldehyde exposure on RA incidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%