2013
DOI: 10.1186/1477-5956-11-15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteomics approach combined with biochemical attributes to elucidate compatible and incompatible plant-virus interactions between Vigna mungo and Mungbean Yellow Mosaic India Virus

Abstract: BackgroundVigna mungo, a tropical leguminous plant, highly susceptible to yellow mosaic disease caused by Mungbean Yellow Mosaic India Virus (MYMIV) resulting in high yield penalty. The molecular events occurring during compatible and incompatible interactions between V. mungo and MYMIV pathosystem are yet to be explored. In this study biochemical analyses in conjunction with proteomics of MYMIV-susceptible and -resistant V. mungo genotypes were executed to get an insight in the molecular events during compati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
50
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cytopathic effect of the ToBMV on the host cell organelles involves chloroplast deformation and the induction of vesicles on its periphery. In general, it is well known that plant viral infection affects plant chloroplasts causing the reduction of several chloroplastic proteins [16,[23][24][25][26][27]. In this study, as expected, these proteins were, indeed, decreased in infected plants when compared to control plants, such as a Sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase (spot 130; Table 1; Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The cytopathic effect of the ToBMV on the host cell organelles involves chloroplast deformation and the induction of vesicles on its periphery. In general, it is well known that plant viral infection affects plant chloroplasts causing the reduction of several chloroplastic proteins [16,[23][24][25][26][27]. In this study, as expected, these proteins were, indeed, decreased in infected plants when compared to control plants, such as a Sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase (spot 130; Table 1; Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In plant virology, as described above, it should be taken into account that viruses encode small proteomes (1-2500 proteins) and that the proteomes of viruses and plants are determined by the virus-host protein interaction, wherein the virus focuses on ensuring its infective replication and the plant focuses on blocking the virus infection. Plant responses to virus infections are speedy, and a drastic change in the protein accumulation is triggered in the whole plant, this protein accumulation provides the crucial clues to understand the plant-virus interaction and the resistance mechanisms to the virus infection (Kundu et al, 2013;Varela et al, 2017;Souza et al, 2019). On the other hand, leaves are a principal organ for studying plant-virus interactions, because these generally exhibit necrotic patches or morphological variations that allows to visually detect the first infection symptoms (Di Carli et al, 2010;Kundu et al, 2013;Varela et al, 2017;Souza et al, 2019).…”
Section: Proteomics To Better Understand Plant-virus Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plant responses to virus infections are speedy, and a drastic change in the protein accumulation is triggered in the whole plant, this protein accumulation provides the crucial clues to understand the plant-virus interaction and the resistance mechanisms to the virus infection (Kundu et al, 2013;Varela et al, 2017;Souza et al, 2019). On the other hand, leaves are a principal organ for studying plant-virus interactions, because these generally exhibit necrotic patches or morphological variations that allows to visually detect the first infection symptoms (Di Carli et al, 2010;Kundu et al, 2013;Varela et al, 2017;Souza et al, 2019). However, not always symptoms are evident, what makes then even more necessary the implementation of reliable and specific techniques, such as proteomics to assess the protein levels and interactions under such conditions (Mochida and Shinozaki, 2011;Mosa et al, 2017).…”
Section: Proteomics To Better Understand Plant-virus Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SA signalling is known to be activated in several biotic and abiotic stresses, viz. heat stress (Dat et al 1998), chilling damage (Kang and Saltveit 2001), heavy metal stress (Metwally et al 2003), drought stress (Bezrukova et al 2001) and biotic stress (Kundu et al 2011(Kundu et al , 2012(Kundu et al , 2013a. Proteomic study of V. mungo plants has revealed an array of interacting metabolic pathways that are involved in conferring tolerance to MYMIV (Mungbean Yellow Mosaic India Virus) and most importantly indicate presence of extensive crosstalk between biotic and abiotic stress responses (Kundu et al 2011(Kundu et al , 2013b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%