2016
DOI: 10.1080/14789450.2016.1190652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteomic interrogation of the gut microbiota: potential clinical impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with metaproteomics, which measures proteins - the direct effectors of biological processes, provides an opportunity to characterize gut microbial functions and activities at a deeper level. The clinical importance of interrogating gut microbiota using metaproteomics has been highlighted recently [74]. To our knowledge, this is the first study that illustrates the effects of synbiotics on the gut microbiota in the context of metabolic disorders using metaproteomics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Compared with metaproteomics, which measures proteins - the direct effectors of biological processes, provides an opportunity to characterize gut microbial functions and activities at a deeper level. The clinical importance of interrogating gut microbiota using metaproteomics has been highlighted recently [74]. To our knowledge, this is the first study that illustrates the effects of synbiotics on the gut microbiota in the context of metabolic disorders using metaproteomics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This has led to concern that disruption of gut microbiota could improve conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease, obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, cancer, autoimmune disorders [23]. The human gut microbiome maintains a high intra- and inter-subject variability with four dominant phyla of Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria [24]. Up to 90% of the gut microbiota belongs to Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria phyla [25, 26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, mapping peptides to proteins and taxa is not trivial due to the many (usually tryptic) peptides that are shared by homologous proteins [21]. In addition, metaproteomic analysis is further challenged by high levels of proteomic sample complexity, dynamic range of the species present and their protein expression levels and, importantly, by large inter- and intra-patient variability [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%