2021
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteomic fingerprinting facilitates biodiversity assessments in understudied ecosystems: A case study on integrated taxonomy of deep sea copepods

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(125 reference statements)
7
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a classification test, all specimens were classified correctly, showing the use of mass spectra for specimen identification. These results are in concordance with previous studies showing the high success of proteome fingerprinting in metazoan specimen identification on taxa such as fish (Mazzeo and Siciliano, 2016;Rossel et al, 2021), insects (Dieme et al, 2014;Raharimalala et al, 2017) or other crustaceans (Bode et al, 2017;Rossel et al, 2019;Renz et al, 2021). Overall, MALDI-TOF MS seems to be a promising fast and low-cost tool for the identification of deep-sea isopods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In a classification test, all specimens were classified correctly, showing the use of mass spectra for specimen identification. These results are in concordance with previous studies showing the high success of proteome fingerprinting in metazoan specimen identification on taxa such as fish (Mazzeo and Siciliano, 2016;Rossel et al, 2021), insects (Dieme et al, 2014;Raharimalala et al, 2017) or other crustaceans (Bode et al, 2017;Rossel et al, 2019;Renz et al, 2021). Overall, MALDI-TOF MS seems to be a promising fast and low-cost tool for the identification of deep-sea isopods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In line with previous studies on marine copepods (Riccardi et al, 2012, Laakmann et al, 2013, Bode et al, 2017, Kaiser et al, 2018, Rossel & Martinez Arbizu, 2018a, Renz et al, 2021, Yeom et al, 2021, our results clearly support the high discriminatory power of proteomic fingerprinting on species level in this taxonomic group. All specimens were correctly assigned to the different 27 species by a RF model for classification with only low sensitivity to data processing indicating high robustness of the method.…”
Section: Species Identification and Species-specific Markerssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Proteomic fingerprinting as a fast, efficient, and low-cost method for species identification , Renz et al, 2021 has a large potential to evolve to a valuable add-on to the current classical and molecular toolbox in zooplankton identification. In short, sample tissue is extracted in a matrix-solution, which is then applied onto a target plate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…resedaeformis and D. pertusum were found in distinct clusters. Thus, a library with a sufficient number of spectra for all species, respectively, would probably also allow the supervised identification of unknown specimens using either reference library based approaches such as RF or factory delivered software such as the Bruker Biotyper as was shown in previous studies on metazoans with high success rates (Bode et al, 2017;Kaiser et al, 2018;Rossel et al, , 2021Wilke et al, 2020;Paulus et al, 2021;Renz et al, 2021). Unfortunately, some species in our analysis were represented with an insufficient number of specimens, resulting in a mixed cluster of species that lacked conspecifics for comparison (Figure 4, cluster CX).…”
Section: Proteome Fingerprintingmentioning
confidence: 99%