2017
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2017.349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteomic and genomic integration identifies kinase and differentiation determinants of kinase inhibitor sensitivity in leukemia cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Continuing this trend, most approved drugs for cancer target tyrosine kinases, and more broadly, kinases are the most common targets for cancer currently in clinical trials (167). Interrogating kinase activity to better understand cancer treatment response has also been highly effective (168)(169)(170). However, despite these successes, more than half of the kinome remains untargeted, even when considering nonclinically approved small molecules.…”
Section: The Druggable Phosphoproteomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuing this trend, most approved drugs for cancer target tyrosine kinases, and more broadly, kinases are the most common targets for cancer currently in clinical trials (167). Interrogating kinase activity to better understand cancer treatment response has also been highly effective (168)(169)(170). However, despite these successes, more than half of the kinome remains untargeted, even when considering nonclinically approved small molecules.…”
Section: The Druggable Phosphoproteomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the biological relevance of the network circuitries encoded in our PDT dataset in a larger and more clinically relevant set of cancer models, we measured our markers of network topology in 36 primary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) biopsies. Phosphoproteomics and drug sensitivity data for these models have been recently published 15 . As reported before 15 , primary AML cells showed highly heterogeneous responses to treatments with inhibitors of MEK1/2, FLT3/PKC, PAK isoforms, P38 and CK2 ( Fig.…”
Section: Identification Of Network Circuitries In Cancer Cells Of Dismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phosphoproteomics and drug sensitivity data for these models have been recently published 15 . As reported before 15 , primary AML cells showed highly heterogeneous responses to treatments with inhibitors of MEK1/2, FLT3/PKC, PAK isoforms, P38 and CK2 ( Fig. 4a).…”
Section: Identification Of Network Circuitries In Cancer Cells Of Dismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Downloaded by guest on July 10, 2020 not be applicable to those treated with induction therapies other than 7 + 3. While the results presented here are informative and, in principle, point to the potential of personalized therapy for refractory AML, their applicability to the clinical setting must await clinical trials to establish the safety and efficacy of such approaches (20,47,(59)(60)(61)(62)(63)(64). The biological heterogeneity described here explains the limited efficacy of current therapeutic approaches to treat refractory AML and the suboptimal ability of pretreatment disease biology, clinical factors, and gene expressionbased signatures to correctly identify, on an individual patient level, the likelihood of achieving complete remission after conventional cytotoxic induction therapy.…”
Section: Medical Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 98%