2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2017.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteomic and biochemical assays of glutathione-related proteins in susceptible and multiple herbicide resistant Avena fatua L.

Abstract: Extensive herbicide usage has led to the evolution of resistant weed populations that cause substantial crop yield losses and increase production costs. The multiple herbicide resistant (MHR) Avena fatua L. populations utilized in this study are resistant to members of all selective herbicide families, across five modes of action, available for A. fatua control in U.S. small grain production, and thus pose significant agronomic and economic threats. Resistance to ALS and ACCase inhibitors is not conferred by t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table , all resistant populations characterized to date exhibit various pleiotropic effects at the whole plant, biochemical, or molecular level. Of these, MHR A. fatua contains more documented molecular changes than other species, as well as several unusual resistance mechanisms, and so it has been used as a model to investigate the primary stress effects associated with the evolution of NTSR . Initial efforts to describe these have focused on constitutive differences between MHR and susceptible populations, because they are most likely to represent changes that would lead to pleiotropic effects.…”
Section: Pleiotropic Features In Resistant Weedsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Table , all resistant populations characterized to date exhibit various pleiotropic effects at the whole plant, biochemical, or molecular level. Of these, MHR A. fatua contains more documented molecular changes than other species, as well as several unusual resistance mechanisms, and so it has been used as a model to investigate the primary stress effects associated with the evolution of NTSR . Initial efforts to describe these have focused on constitutive differences between MHR and susceptible populations, because they are most likely to represent changes that would lead to pleiotropic effects.…”
Section: Pleiotropic Features In Resistant Weedsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…92 Enhanced herbicide catabolism does not appear to play a major role in MHR A. fatua, because glutathione S-transferase specific activities towards fenoxaprop-P-ethyl and imazamethabenz-methyl were not different between untreated MHR and susceptible plants 34 and only a relatively small number of constitutively elevated xenobiotic catabolism transcripts and proteins were detected in MHR plants. 28,34 The A. fatua NTSR phenotype is heritable and stable for multiple generations in the absence of herbicide treatment. 90 Specific herbicide use histories from the fields where the MHR A. fatua populations were collected are not available, but regional practices indicate that they evolved under 40 years of chronological rotations of selective herbicides.…”
Section: Multiple Herbicide Resistant Avena Fatuamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From each generation of 50 plants, all seeds were harvested and a random selection of 50 seeds was used to initiate five additional generations without herbicide selection to homogenise the genetic background. These two populations were used to successfully characterise the biochemical mechanisms responsible for MHR (Burns et al ., ; Keith et al ., ), as well as the physiological and ecological consequences of MHR (Lehnhoff et al ., ,b). The susceptible HS1 population was derived from seeds of untreated plants bordering an adjacent barley production field, grown for seven generations as described for MHR3–4 except without herbicide selection, and was confirmed to be 100% susceptible to field rates of the herbicide used in this study (Lehnhoff et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%