2005
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200401198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteomic analysis of synaptosomes using isotope‐coded affinity tags and mass spectrometry

Abstract: Synaptosomes are isolated synapses produced by subcellular fractionation of brain tissue. They contain the complete presynaptic terminal, including mitochondria and synaptic vesicles, and portions of the postsynaptic side, including the postsynaptic membrane and the postsynaptic density (PSyD). A proteomic characterisation of synaptosomes isolated from mouse brain was performed employing the isotope-coded affinity tag (ICAT) method and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). After isotopic labelling and tryptic dige… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
80
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
7
80
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the cell body and axon terminal of the same neuron are often located in two different functional regions. Although some laboratories have demonstrated MudPIT as an efficient platform for high-throughput protein identification of the brain proteome Phillips et al 2004;Cagney et al 2005;Schrimpf et al 2005;Witzmann et al 2005), a large-scale quantitative methodology is lacking for analysis of the brain proteome. For example, using the AQUA (absolute protein identification) strategy, the differential expres-sion of 32 proteins between brain regions has been reported (Peng et al 2004;Cheng et al 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the cell body and axon terminal of the same neuron are often located in two different functional regions. Although some laboratories have demonstrated MudPIT as an efficient platform for high-throughput protein identification of the brain proteome Phillips et al 2004;Cagney et al 2005;Schrimpf et al 2005;Witzmann et al 2005), a large-scale quantitative methodology is lacking for analysis of the brain proteome. For example, using the AQUA (absolute protein identification) strategy, the differential expres-sion of 32 proteins between brain regions has been reported (Peng et al 2004;Cheng et al 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite recent progress, such as the enrichment of total plasma membrane from rat cerebellar tissue by affinity partitioning [100], further refinements are required to isolate and analyze the various plasma membrane microdomains in sufficient purity and yield. A recent proteomic analysis of synaptosomes isolated by differential and density-gradient centrifugation from mouse brain, resulted in more than 1100 protein identifications [132]. However, only 50% overlap was observed between two independent experiments and known synaptosomal proteins, including the inhibitory neurotransmitter receptors and vesicular glutamate transporters were not detected at all.…”
Section: Focused Proteomic Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these studies identified only a small collection of proteins relative to the thousands of proteins now known to occupy the excitatory PSD (Bayes and Grant, 2009), they were among the first to identify additional PSD-associated proteins vital to postsynaptic functioning, including an array of cytoskeletal and scaffolding proteins, cell-adhesion molecules, and proteins modulating small G-protein signaling, adaptor proteins, glutamate receptors, and various signaling molecules (Husi et al, 2000;Walikonis et al, 2000;Satoh et al, 2002). Building upon these early results, more recent investigations have utilized proteomic techniques ranging from SDS-PAGE and 2-DE coupled with mass spectrometry (Jordan et al, 2004;Li et al, 2004;Peng et al, 2004;Collins et al, 2006;Dosemeci et al, 2006;Klemmer et al, 2009), to ICAT labeling or MudPIT (Li et al, 2004;Yoshimura et al, 2004;Phillips et al, 2005;Schrimpf et al, 2005;Moron et al, 2007), and even tandem affinity purification (TAP) tagged-PSD-95 knock-in mice coupled with 1-DE and LC-MS/MS analysis (Fernandez et al, 2009) to identify thousands of proteins that are associated with the structure and function of the excitatory PSD (Collins et al, 2006;Fernandez et al, 2009;summarized in Table 2). Although the importance of these studies in elucidating the molecular and chemical components of the excitatory PSD cannot be overstated, only recently have the powerful tools Figure 1.…”
Section: Neuroproteomics Of the Synapsementioning
confidence: 99%