Abstract:The objective of the present study was to describe the relationship of seminal plasma and total sperm cell proteins with the semen freezability parameters of Guzerat bulls. Thirteen bulls were subjected to breeding soundness evaluation. Semen samples were collected, cryopreserved, and then post-thawing sperm kinetics were assessed, where high ( = 7) and low ( = 6) freezability groups were defined. Seminal plasma and total sperm proteins from the 2 groups were separated by 2-dimensional SDS-PAGE, and spots were… Show more
“…Other studies conducted in bull, ram and buck revealed that quantitative variations in seminal plasma and sperm proteins also appeared between males [90][91][92][93][94][95][96], which could explain in part the individual variability observed in sperm freezability [97,98]. Males are frequently categorized as good or bad freezers depending on their post-thaw sperm quality; however, molecular biomarkers could predict more efficiently sperm cryotolerance before freezing-thawing in different individuals [10].…”
Section: Molecular Mechanisms Involved In Those Factors That May Affementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, proteins involved in energy metabolism, motility regulation and sperm membrane protection increased in abundance in males classified as good freezers (Table 1). These changes could explain the greater sperm viability, mitochondrial activity and motility of good freezers compared to bad freezers [90][91][92][93][94][95][99][100][101]. In this context, freezability biomarkers can be a useful tool to select those males with a superior sperm freezing resilience.…”
Section: Molecular Mechanisms Involved In Those Factors That May Affementioning
Sperm cryopreservation represents a powerful tool for livestock breeding. Several efforts have been made to improve the efficiency of sperm cryopreservation in different ruminant species. However, a significant amount of sperm still suffers considerable cryodamage, which may affect sperm quality and fertility. Recently, the use of different “omics” technologies in sperm cryobiology, especially proteomics studies, has led to a better understanding of the molecular modifications induced by sperm cryopreservation, facilitating the identification of different freezability biomarkers and certain proteins that can be added before cryopreservation to enhance sperm cryosurvival. This review provides an updated overview of the molecular mechanisms involved in sperm cryodamage, which are in part responsible for the structural, functional and fertility changes observed in frozen–thawed ruminant sperm. Moreover, the molecular basis of those factors that can affect the sperm freezing resilience of different ruminant species is also discussed as well as the molecular aspects of those novel strategies that have been developed to reduce sperm cryodamage, including new cryoprotectants, antioxidants, proteins, nanoparticles and vitrification.
“…Other studies conducted in bull, ram and buck revealed that quantitative variations in seminal plasma and sperm proteins also appeared between males [90][91][92][93][94][95][96], which could explain in part the individual variability observed in sperm freezability [97,98]. Males are frequently categorized as good or bad freezers depending on their post-thaw sperm quality; however, molecular biomarkers could predict more efficiently sperm cryotolerance before freezing-thawing in different individuals [10].…”
Section: Molecular Mechanisms Involved In Those Factors That May Affementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, proteins involved in energy metabolism, motility regulation and sperm membrane protection increased in abundance in males classified as good freezers (Table 1). These changes could explain the greater sperm viability, mitochondrial activity and motility of good freezers compared to bad freezers [90][91][92][93][94][95][99][100][101]. In this context, freezability biomarkers can be a useful tool to select those males with a superior sperm freezing resilience.…”
Section: Molecular Mechanisms Involved In Those Factors That May Affementioning
Sperm cryopreservation represents a powerful tool for livestock breeding. Several efforts have been made to improve the efficiency of sperm cryopreservation in different ruminant species. However, a significant amount of sperm still suffers considerable cryodamage, which may affect sperm quality and fertility. Recently, the use of different “omics” technologies in sperm cryobiology, especially proteomics studies, has led to a better understanding of the molecular modifications induced by sperm cryopreservation, facilitating the identification of different freezability biomarkers and certain proteins that can be added before cryopreservation to enhance sperm cryosurvival. This review provides an updated overview of the molecular mechanisms involved in sperm cryodamage, which are in part responsible for the structural, functional and fertility changes observed in frozen–thawed ruminant sperm. Moreover, the molecular basis of those factors that can affect the sperm freezing resilience of different ruminant species is also discussed as well as the molecular aspects of those novel strategies that have been developed to reduce sperm cryodamage, including new cryoprotectants, antioxidants, proteins, nanoparticles and vitrification.
“…ANXA1 and PAFA were both shown to be significantly higher in bulls with low sperm freezability. However, in the same study, ANXA1 was more pronounced in sperm protein extracts from bull with high freezability (Rego et al, 2016). These studies support that ANXA1 is involved in promotion of membrane aggregation and fusion events and likely involved in membrane repair (Rescher & Gerke, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The protein is associated with the cell surface and is involved in epithelial cell proliferation, direct cell migration, and angiogenesis (Coulthard et al, 2012). It has been identified to be increased in bulls with low freezability, and speculated to be involved in inflammatory response, with increases occurring in response to oxidative stress (Rego et al, 2016). In the same study Acrosin inhibitor 1 (SPINK6) was shown to be negatively associated with postthaw sperm motility in B. indicus bulls; where a higher acrosin release from the acrosome before cryopreservation, may result in reduced cryotolerance (Rego et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been identified to be increased in bulls with low freezability, and speculated to be involved in inflammatory response, with increases occurring in response to oxidative stress (Rego et al, 2016). In the same study Acrosin inhibitor 1 (SPINK6) was shown to be negatively associated with postthaw sperm motility in B. indicus bulls; where a higher acrosin release from the acrosome before cryopreservation, may result in reduced cryotolerance (Rego et al, 2016). In our study the protein was in spots associated with HD in Period 2.…”
Environmental temperature has effects on sperm quality with differences in susceptibility between cattle subspecies and breeds, but very little is known about the seminal plasma protein (SPP) changes resulting from testicular heat stress. Scrotal insulation (SI) for 48 hr was applied to Brahman (Bos indicus) bulls. Semen was collected at 3-day intervals from before, until 74 days post-SI. The changes in sperm morphology and motility following SI were comparable to previously reported and differences were detected in measures of sperm chromatin conformation as early as 8 days post-SI. New proteins spots, in the SPP two-dimensional (2-D) gels, were apparent when comparing pre-SI with 74 days post-SI, and SPP identified as associated with mechanisms of cellular repair and protection. Similar trends between 2-D gel and Sequential Window Acquisition of All Theoretical Mass Spectra (SWATH -MS) data was observed, with SWATH-MS able to quantify individual SPP that otherwise were not resolved on 2-D gel. The SPP assessment at peak sperm damage (21-24 days) showed a significant difference in 29 SPP (adjusted p < .05), and identified six proteins with change in abundance in the SI group. In conclusion both spermatozoa and SPP composition of bulls are susceptible to temperature change incurred by SI, and SPP markers for testicular heat insults may be detected.
K E Y W O R D Schromatin structure, MS-based proteomics, scrotal insulation, testicular stress Note: Period 1-impact on epididymal maturation (2-11 days post-SI), Period 2-impact on spermiogenesis and meiosis (14-41 days post-SI), Period 3-impact on spermatocytogenesis (44-62 days post-SI), and Period 4-impact after one full wave of spermatogenesis (65-74 days post-SI); where Day 0 represents initiation of the 48 hr period of SI. The data are presented as means ± SE for bulls with applied SI for 48 hr (n = 3) and control (n = 3). The PNS is further differentiated into the proportion of spermatozoa with HD, D, MPD, and TD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.