Proteomic analysis of Laodelphax striatellus gonads reveals proteins that may manipulate host reproduction by Wolbachia

Huang, Hai‐Jian; Cui, Jia‐Rong; Chen, Jie; Bing, Xiao‐Li; Hong, Xia

doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2019.103211

Cited by 8 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Significant correlations between Wolbachia symbiont state and host expression have been measured in D. melanogaster ( Biwot et al, 2020 ; He et al, 2019 ; LePage et al, 2014 ; Liu et al, 2014 ; Ote et al, 2016 ; Xi et al, 2008 ; Yuan et al, 2015 ; Zheng et al, 2019b ; Zheng et al, 2011 ), D. simulans ( Brennan et al, 2012 ; Clark et al, 2006 ; Xi et al, 2008 ), La. striatellus ( Huang et al, 2019 ; Ju et al, 2017 ; Liu et al, 2019 ), T. urticae ( Bing et al, 2020a ; Zhang et al, 2015 ) , Cu. pipiens ( Pinto et al, 2013 ), and A. albopictus ( Baldridge et al, 2017 ; Baldridge et al, 2014 ; Brennan et al, 2012 ; Brennan et al, 2008 ).…”

Section: What Is the Host’s Contribution To Ci?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Symbiont-mediated cytoplasmic incompatibility: What have we learned in 50 years?

Shropshire

Leigh

Bordenstein

2020

eLife

121

151

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) is the most common symbiont-induced reproductive manipulation. Specifically, symbiont-induced sperm modifications cause catastrophic mitotic defects in the fertilized embryo and ensuing lethality in crosses between symbiotic males and either aposymbiotic females or females harboring a different symbiont strain. However, if the female carries the same symbiont strain, then embryos develop properly, thereby imparting a relative fitness benefit to symbiont-transmitting mothers. Thus, CI drives maternally-transmitted bacteria to high frequencies in arthropods worldwide. In the past two decades, CI experienced a boom in interest due to its (i) deployment in worldwide efforts to curb mosquito-borne diseases, (ii) causation by bacteriophage genes, cifA and cifB, that modify sexual reproduction, and (iii) important impacts on arthropod speciation. This review serves as a gateway to experimental, conceptual, and quantitative themes of CI and outlines significant gaps in understanding CI’s mechanism that are ripe for investigation from diverse subdisciplines in the life sciences.

show abstract

Section: What Is the Host’s Contribution To Ci?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Symbiont-mediated cytoplasmic incompatibility: What have we learned in 50 years?

Shropshire

Leigh

Bordenstein

2020

eLife

121

151

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…First, a defensive model would predict that the pathway(s) that CI act(s) on in the host must be conserved enough for CI to be transferable between species, but also malleable enough for the pathway(s) to become resistant to CI-induction. The host genes, transcripts, and proteins described earlier in this review are excellent candidates since they can mimic CI phenotypes (Biwot et al, 2019;Huang et al, 2019;Ju et al, 2017;Yuan et al, 2015;Zheng et al, 2011). However, studies are necessary to investigate genetic variation in these host products to assess the possibility that they are under selection to suppress CI.…”

Section: Host Geneticsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Significant correlations between Wolbachia infection state and host expression have been measured in D. melanogaster (Biwot et al, 2019;He et al, 2019;LePage et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2014;Ote et al, 2016;Xi et al, 2008;Yuan et al, 2015;Zheng et al, 2011), D. simulans (Brennan et al, 2012;Clark et al, 2006;Xi et al, 2008), La. striatellus (Huang et al, 2019;Ju et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2019), T. urticae (Bing et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2015), Cu. pipiens (Pinto et al, 2013), and A. albopictus (Baldridge et al, 2017(Baldridge et al, , 2014Brennan et al, 2012Brennan et al, , 2008.…”

Section: What Is the Host's Contribution To Ci?mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…striatellus (Ju et al, 2017), the sRNA nov-miR-12 which negatively regulates the DNA-binding protein pipsqueak (psq) in chromatin remodeling in D. melanogaster (Y. , cytosol amino-peptidase-like which are in the sperm acrosome and involved in fertilization in La. striatellus (Huang et al, 2019), two seminal fluid proteins (CG9334 and CG2668) with unknown function in D. melanogaster (Yuan et al, 2015), the histone chaperone Hira in D. melanogaster and D. simulans (Zheng et al, 2011), a Juvenile Hormone protein (JHI-26) involved in development in D. melanogaster (Liu et al, 2014), and the immunityrelated gene kenny (key) in D. melanogaster (Biwot et al, 2019). Since misexpression of these host products in aposymbiotic males mimic CI-like embryonic defects in a way that can be rescued by symbiont-bearing females, there is support that these products or their pathways are involved in CI, but how these factors relate to cause CI remains unknown, and there is no current evidence that these are binding partners with Cif proteins.…”

Section: What Is the Host's Contribution To Ci?mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Symbiont-Mediated Cytoplasmic Incompatibility: What have we Learned in 50 Years?

Shropshire¹,

Leigh²,

Bordenstein³

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) is the most common symbiont-induced reproductive manipulation. Specifically, symbiont-induced sperm modifications cause catastrophic mitotic defects in the fertilized embryo and ensuing lethality in crosses between symbiotic males and either aposymbiotic females or females harboring a different symbiont strain. However, if the female carries the same symbiont strain, then embryos develop properly, which imparts a relative fitness benefit to symbiont-transmitting mothers. Thus, CI drives maternally transmitted bacteria to high frequencies in arthropod species worldwide. In the past two decades, CI has experienced a boom in interest due in part to its (i) deployment in successful, worldwide efforts to reduce the spread of mosquito-borne diseases, (ii) causation by bacteriophage genes, cifA and cifB, that modify animal reproductive processes, and (iii) important impacts on incipient speciation. This review serves as a gateway to experimental, conceptual, and quantitative themes of CI and outlines significant gaps in our understanding of CI’s mechanism that are ripe for investigation from a diversity of subdisciplines in the life sciences.

show abstract

“…Significant correlations between Wolbachia symbiont state and host expression have been measured in D. melanogaster (Biwot et al, 2019;He et al, 2019;LePage et al, 2014;Liu et al, 2014;Ote et al, 2016;Xi et al, 2008;Yuan et al, 2015;Zheng et al, 2011), D. simulans (Brennan et al, 2012;Clark et al, 2006;Xi et al, 2008), La. striatellus (Huang et al, 2019;Ju et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2019), T. urticae (Bing et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2015), Cu. pipiens (Pinto et al, 2013), and A. albopictus (Baldridge et al, 2017(Baldridge et al, , 2014Brennan et al, 2012Brennan et al, , 2008.…”

Section: What Is the Host's Contribution To Ci?mentioning

confidence: 99%

<strong>Symbiont-mediated Cytoplasmic Incompatibility:</strong><strong>What Have We Learned in 50 years?</strong>

Shropshire

Leigh

Bordenstein

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cytoplasmic incompatibility (CI) is the most common symbiont-induced reproductive manipulation. Specifically, symbiont-induced sperm modifications cause catastrophic mitotic defects in the fertilized embryo and ensuing lethality in crosses between symbiotic males and either aposymbiotic females or females harboring a different symbiont strain. However, if the female carries the same symbiont strain, then embryos develop properly, which imparts a relative fitness benefit to symbiont-transmitting mothers. Thus, CI drives maternally transmitted bacteria to high frequencies in arthropod species worldwide. In the past two decades, CI has experienced a boom in interest due in part to its (i) deployment in successful, worldwide efforts to reduce the spread of mosquito-borne diseases, (ii) causation by bacteriophage genes, cifA and cifB, that modify animal reproductive processes, and (iii) important impacts on incipient speciation. This review serves as a gateway to experimental, conceptual, and quantitative themes of CI and outlines significant gaps in our understanding of CI’s mechanism that are ripe for investigation from a diversity of subdisciplines in the life sciences.

show abstract

Proteomic analysis of Laodelphax striatellus gonads reveals proteins that may manipulate host reproduction by Wolbachia

Cited by 8 publications

References 50 publications

Symbiont-mediated cytoplasmic incompatibility: What have we learned in 50 years?

Symbiont-mediated cytoplasmic incompatibility: What have we learned in 50 years?

Symbiont-Mediated Cytoplasmic Incompatibility: What have we Learned in 50 Years?

<strong>Symbiont-mediated Cytoplasmic Incompatibility:</strong><strong>What Have We Learned in 50 years?</strong>

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About