2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2016.04.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteomic analysis of human tooth pulp proteomes – Comparison of caries-resistant and caries-susceptible persons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
22
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Sample purification was improved by extracting tryptic peptides using Stage Tips . Nano‐liquid chromatography procedure, mass spectrometry (MS), and tandem MS (MS/MS) analyses were performed as described in our previous studies, with upgraded software. Our MS device (Maxis quadrupole time‐of‐flight mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany)) allowed us to compare up to 100 most abundant proteins in two data sets using label‐free quantification.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sample purification was improved by extracting tryptic peptides using Stage Tips . Nano‐liquid chromatography procedure, mass spectrometry (MS), and tandem MS (MS/MS) analyses were performed as described in our previous studies, with upgraded software. Our MS device (Maxis quadrupole time‐of‐flight mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany)) allowed us to compare up to 100 most abundant proteins in two data sets using label‐free quantification.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.3.0, http://www.matrixscience.com). Database searches were performed, as described in our previous study, with the taxonomy restricted to Homo sapiens to remove protein identification redundancy . Briefly, trypsin (or semitrypsin) was chosen as an enzyme parameter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mixture was centrifuged PLOS ONE at 9000 × g for 10 min at 4˚C and the remaining pellet was solubilized with 600 μl lysis buffer containing 30 mM Tris, 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% (w/v) 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl) dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS), pH was adjusted to 8.5 with 50 mM NaOH. Each 50 μg of protein sample (−M10, +M10 and −M10/−M20, +M10/−M20) was labeled with 600 pmol of cyanine CyDye DIGE Fluor minimal dyes Cy3, Cy5 or Cy2 according to Jágr et al [20].…”
Section: D-digementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two-dimensional fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) and MALDI--TOF MS/MS was used for comparison of protein profiling in hippocampal samples prepared from (+M10), (−M10), (+M10/−M20) and (−M10/−M20) groups of rats, [19,20]. Results obtained by 2D-DIGE were verified by immunoblot analysis of 2D gels and a gel-free, label free proteomic analysis, MaxLFQ [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%