2019
DOI: 10.1104/pp.18.01216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteome-wide, Structure-Based Prediction of Protein-Protein Interactions/New Molecular Interactions Viewer

Abstract: Determining the complete Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) protein-protein interaction network is essential for understanding the functional organization of the proteome. Numerous small-scale studies and a couple of large-scale ones have elucidated a fraction of the estimated 300,000 binary protein-protein interactions in Arabidopsis. In this study, we provide evidence that a docking algorithm has the ability to identify real interactions using both experimentally determined and predicted protein structures. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the interactome of A. thaliana, the number of experimental PPIs is relatively large, and some predicted interactomes have been publicly available, which has allowed us to directly compare our predicted PPIs with some existing interactomes. To this end, we collected 9065 predicted highly reliable A. thaliana PPIs (S-PPIs) from [43], which was based on a docking scoring algorithm using both experimentally determined and predicted protein structures. The self-interactions and interactions with proteins not appearing in our collected A. thaliana proteome were removed, and 8358 PPIs were finally retained.…”
Section: Reliability Assessment Of Predicted Protein Interaction Netwmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the interactome of A. thaliana, the number of experimental PPIs is relatively large, and some predicted interactomes have been publicly available, which has allowed us to directly compare our predicted PPIs with some existing interactomes. To this end, we collected 9065 predicted highly reliable A. thaliana PPIs (S-PPIs) from [43], which was based on a docking scoring algorithm using both experimentally determined and predicted protein structures. The self-interactions and interactions with proteins not appearing in our collected A. thaliana proteome were removed, and 8358 PPIs were finally retained.…”
Section: Reliability Assessment Of Predicted Protein Interaction Netwmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To increase the coverage of these 13 plant interactomes, a large amount of predicted PPI data was collected in PlaP-PISite, although the reliability of predicted PPIs is always controversial. Even though three pieces of indirect evidence and a direct comparison with a predicted A. thaliana interactome developed by [43] have been provided to prove the acceptable reliability of the PPI prediction, the predicted PPIs in PlaPPISite may inevitably contain large volumes of false positives. Two efforts have been made to effectively guide users to use the predicted PPI data properly.…”
Section: Reliability Of Predicted Ppis and Predicted Protein Complex mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach generated the ATIN consisting of 476 interactions between 97 Arabidopsis ABA-regulated proteins and 56 P. syringae T3SEs (Figure 1a). An interactive view of this network is available at http://bar.utoronto.ca/ATIN/ArabidopsisInter actome.html and in the Bio-Analtyic Resource's Arabidopsis Interactions Viewer 2 at http://bar.utoronto.ca/inte ractions2/ (Dong et al, 2019). A full list of all PPIs in ATIN are available in Table S1.…”
Section: The Atinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interaction scores as described in Lumba et al . () for all 476 PPIs in ATIN are presented in Table S1 and can be visualized interactively at http://bar.utoronto.ca/ATIN/ArabidopsisInteractome.html, for the ATIN data set itself, and at http://bar.utoronto.ca/interactions2/ (Dong et al ., ) for the ATIN and ~80,000 other protein‐protein interactions. Data are also viewable in ePlant (Waese et al ., ).…”
Section: Data Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, proteomics is a powerful approach to study the molecular processes of pollen development, and also a powerful complement to the whole genome sequencing [24]. Based on the proteins identified in this work, a detailed pathway was successfully constructed and protein-protein interactions were more clearly understood [25]. To date, there has been an increased application of proteomics approaches to study the pollen reproduction or pollen responses to abiotic stress, for example, Lycopersicon esculentum (Response to heat-stress and ethylene) [18], Oryza sativa (Response to high temperature-stress) [23], Triticum aestivum (Response to drought-stress) [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%