Abstract:Molecular mimicry is a strategy used by parasites to escape the host immune system and successfully transmit to a new host. To date, high-throughput examples of molecular mimicry have been limited to comparing protein sequences. However, with advances in the prediction of tertiary structural models, led by Deepmind's AlphaFold, it is now possible to compare the tertiary structures of thousands of proteins from parasites and their hosts, to identify more subtle mimics. Here, we present the first proteome-level … Show more
“…Examples of structural mimics have been known for decades, despite the difficulty in detecting them prior to accurate ab initio protein structure prediction tools, through protein crystal structures and binding data. Recent advances in protein structure and interaction predictions are enabling the discovery of many more structural mimics, both across genomes and taxa [17,58,59].…”
Section: Structural Mimicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein structural predictions and structural alignment algorithms have been in development for decades, and have been instrumental in identifying similar protein structures between pathogens and hosts [15]. Structural mimic candidates are recognizable through 1) alignment between mimic and target protein structures [87], 2) interactions between the mimic and its interacting partners [16], and 3) competitive interactions between the mimic and targets for the interacting partners (e.g., [17,59]). Through combining these well-developed conceptual frameworks with recent innovations in structural prediction, more structural mimics can be identified.…”
“…By the 2010s, the power of whole genome sequencing and accumulating genomic data in public databases made in silico screens for molecular mimicry possible [12][13][14][15]. The power of these approaches strengthens every year, as more genomes across the tree of life are sequenced and as new tools, such as AlphaFold [16], are developed for computationally predicting and comparing molecular function [17]. Full knowledge about the distribution of molecular mimicry in nature awaits genome mining studies across the tree of life.…”
Section: Introduction To Genetic Conflict and Molecular Mimicrymentioning
In genetic conflicts, driver and killer elements achieve biased survival, replication, or transmission over sensitive and targeted elements through a wide range of molecular mechanisms, including mimicry. Driving mechanisms manifest at all organismal levels, from the biased propagation of individual genes, as demonstrated by transposable elements, to the biased transmission of genomes, as illustrated by viruses, to the biased transmission of cell lineages, as in cancer. Targeted genomes are vulnerable to molecular mimicry through the conserved motifs they use for their own signaling and regulation. Mimicking these motifs enables a selfish element to control core target processes, and can occur at the sequence, structure, or functional level. Molecular mimicry was first appreciated as an important phenomenon more than twenty years ago. Modern genomics technologies, databases, and machine learning approaches offer tremendous potential to study the distribution of molecular mimicry across genetic conflicts in nature. Here, we explore the theoretical expectations for molecular mimicry between conflicting genomes, the trends in molecular mimicry mechanisms across known genetic conflicts, and outline how new examples can be gleaned from population genomic datasets. We discuss how mimics involving short sequence-based motifs or gene duplications can evolve convergently from new mutations. Whereas, processes that involve divergent domains or fully-folded structures occur among genomes by horizontal gene transfer. These trends are largely based on a small number of organisms and should be reevaluated in a general, phylogenetically independent framework. Currently, publicly available databases can be mined for genotypes driving non-mendelian inheritance patterns, epistatic interactions, and convergent protein structures. A subset of these conflicting elements may be molecular mimics. We propose approaches for detecting genetic conflict and molecular mimicry from these datasets.
“…Examples of structural mimics have been known for decades, despite the difficulty in detecting them prior to accurate ab initio protein structure prediction tools, through protein crystal structures and binding data. Recent advances in protein structure and interaction predictions are enabling the discovery of many more structural mimics, both across genomes and taxa [17,58,59].…”
Section: Structural Mimicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein structural predictions and structural alignment algorithms have been in development for decades, and have been instrumental in identifying similar protein structures between pathogens and hosts [15]. Structural mimic candidates are recognizable through 1) alignment between mimic and target protein structures [87], 2) interactions between the mimic and its interacting partners [16], and 3) competitive interactions between the mimic and targets for the interacting partners (e.g., [17,59]). Through combining these well-developed conceptual frameworks with recent innovations in structural prediction, more structural mimics can be identified.…”
“…By the 2010s, the power of whole genome sequencing and accumulating genomic data in public databases made in silico screens for molecular mimicry possible [12][13][14][15]. The power of these approaches strengthens every year, as more genomes across the tree of life are sequenced and as new tools, such as AlphaFold [16], are developed for computationally predicting and comparing molecular function [17]. Full knowledge about the distribution of molecular mimicry in nature awaits genome mining studies across the tree of life.…”
Section: Introduction To Genetic Conflict and Molecular Mimicrymentioning
In genetic conflicts, driver and killer elements achieve biased survival, replication, or transmission over sensitive and targeted elements through a wide range of molecular mechanisms, including mimicry. Driving mechanisms manifest at all organismal levels, from the biased propagation of individual genes, as demonstrated by transposable elements, to the biased transmission of genomes, as illustrated by viruses, to the biased transmission of cell lineages, as in cancer. Targeted genomes are vulnerable to molecular mimicry through the conserved motifs they use for their own signaling and regulation. Mimicking these motifs enables a selfish element to control core target processes, and can occur at the sequence, structure, or functional level. Molecular mimicry was first appreciated as an important phenomenon more than twenty years ago. Modern genomics technologies, databases, and machine learning approaches offer tremendous potential to study the distribution of molecular mimicry across genetic conflicts in nature. Here, we explore the theoretical expectations for molecular mimicry between conflicting genomes, the trends in molecular mimicry mechanisms across known genetic conflicts, and outline how new examples can be gleaned from population genomic datasets. We discuss how mimics involving short sequence-based motifs or gene duplications can evolve convergently from new mutations. Whereas, processes that involve divergent domains or fully-folded structures occur among genomes by horizontal gene transfer. These trends are largely based on a small number of organisms and should be reevaluated in a general, phylogenetically independent framework. Currently, publicly available databases can be mined for genotypes driving non-mendelian inheritance patterns, epistatic interactions, and convergent protein structures. A subset of these conflicting elements may be molecular mimics. We propose approaches for detecting genetic conflict and molecular mimicry from these datasets.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.