2006
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2005.0265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteolysis and Characterization of Peptidases in Forage Plants

Abstract: Plant peptidases are involved in protein degradation in the rumen of grazing animals, but little is known about the variation in their activity under anaerobic conditions at 39°C. We investigated the activity of endogenous peptidases in 342 accessions of grass and legume forages and the molecular weight and class of peptidases in a subsample of them. Proteolytic activity was measured by in vitro incubation of tissue over a gelatin substrate. Molecular weight and class of peptidases were assessed by zymograms. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to McKersie (1985), the rate and endpoint of proteolysis in silage is largely dependent on the rate of pH decline and the proteolytic activity in the leaves of the ensiled forage legumes. Furthermore, the proteolytic activity of forage crops is not only species-dependent; cultivars within species also affect the proteolytic activity (Tremblay et al 2001;Pichard et al 2006). However, differences in the extent of proteolysis among the tested red clover cultivars were absent in the present study ( Table 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…According to McKersie (1985), the rate and endpoint of proteolysis in silage is largely dependent on the rate of pH decline and the proteolytic activity in the leaves of the ensiled forage legumes. Furthermore, the proteolytic activity of forage crops is not only species-dependent; cultivars within species also affect the proteolytic activity (Tremblay et al 2001;Pichard et al 2006). However, differences in the extent of proteolysis among the tested red clover cultivars were absent in the present study ( Table 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…For instance, it is believed that plant-induced proteolysis contributes considerably to degradation and release of N in the rumen (Kingston-Smith et al 2003). Plant-induced proteolysis is a stress response of 'living' plant tissue whereby peptidases are initiated within cell vacuoles upon entry to the rumen (Kingston-Smith et al 2005;Pichard et al 2006). There is considerable variation in proteolytic activity among and within forages (Pichard et al 2006) and identification of plants with reduced proteolytic activity may offer an opportunity to improve rumen N utilisation (Kingston-Smith et al 2002).…”
Section: Synchronised Release Of Nutrientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plant-induced proteolysis is a stress response of 'living' plant tissue whereby peptidases are initiated within cell vacuoles upon entry to the rumen (Kingston-Smith et al 2005;Pichard et al 2006). There is considerable variation in proteolytic activity among and within forages (Pichard et al 2006) and identification of plants with reduced proteolytic activity may offer an opportunity to improve rumen N utilisation (Kingston-Smith et al 2002). Species with a high proteolysis activity index (PAI) such as phalaris, oats and lucerne may be expected to more rapidly degrade in the rumen than species with a low PAI such as brome, Italian ryegrass, lotus and red clover (Pichard et al 2006).…”
Section: Synchronised Release Of Nutrientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies conducting correlations to identify soil properties likely to show gypsum benefits have been rare. The majority of studies examining P runoff have used high-P soils in the southern United States (Endale et al, 2014;Watts and Torbert, 2016), were conducted in a laboratory setting (Stout et al, 2003;Yu et al, 2003;Ige et al, 2007), or used mined rather than FGD gypsum (Chen et al, 2005;Favaretto et al, 2006). This study used an unincorporated, surface application of FGD gypsum in active production fields on soils common to northern Wisconsin.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%