2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.07.004
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proteogenomic analysis of chemo-refractory high-grade serous ovarian cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
1

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 150 publications
0
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite thorough genetic analysis of our unique dataset, we did not find genetic drivers behind chemo-refractory phenotype or lack of IFN-I activity, hinting at non-genomic mechanisms behind chemotherapy resistance. Unlike Chowdhury and colleagues 30 , we did not find the LOH of chromosome 17 to be enriched in patients with chemo-refractory HGSC. However, we replicated their finding that BRAF-mutated tumors were exclusively found in the refractory group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Despite thorough genetic analysis of our unique dataset, we did not find genetic drivers behind chemo-refractory phenotype or lack of IFN-I activity, hinting at non-genomic mechanisms behind chemotherapy resistance. Unlike Chowdhury and colleagues 30 , we did not find the LOH of chromosome 17 to be enriched in patients with chemo-refractory HGSC. However, we replicated their finding that BRAF-mutated tumors were exclusively found in the refractory group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting coverage profiles were masked for outliers and segmented using CBS as implemented in DNACopy 82 . The resulting segmentation profiles were pruned using CNVEX as described previously 83 . The presence of focal gains was determined by identifying segments >50kb in size with a normalized log-coverage of > 0.5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, according to our observation, a lot of glycan misidentifications involved confounding F2 (Fuc [2]) and S (NeuAc), whose masses happen to differ by 1.0204 Da (S mistaken as F2) or −1.0204 Da (F2 substituted by S), as well as the mixup of FS2 (Fuc [1]NeuAc [2]) and G2H2 (HexNAc [2]-Hex [2]) differing by −2.0157 Da. Apparently, the three delta mass clusters could be explained by the glycan misassignment.…”
Section: Need For Xic-based Monoisotope Repickingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative proteomics concerns discovering significant protein abundance changes at the proteome scale and plays an increasingly important role not only in basic research but also in biomarker discovery for personalized diagnosis and treatment of diseases . In these studies, reproducibility is critical for achieving successful outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation