2020
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ProteinsPlus: interactive analysis of protein–ligand binding interfaces

Abstract: Due to the increasing amount of publicly available protein structures searching, enriching and investigating these data still poses a challenging task. The ProteinsPlus web service (https://proteins.plus) offers a broad range of tools addressing these challenges. The web interface to the tool collection focusing on protein–ligand interactions has been geared towards easy and intuitive access to a large variety of functionality for life scientists. Since our last publication, the ProteinsPlus web service has be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
101
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
101
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the PDB structure 6W61 was validated against the X-ray crystal structure of nsp10-nsp16 by Krafcikova et al (PDB ID:6YZ1) [ 36 ] using PyMOL [ 37 ]. Furthermore, to detect potential binding pocket based on the structure nsp10-nsp16, Protein Plus DoGSiteScorer [ 38 ], binding site detection was used to calculate the druggability score. The druggability score values range between zero and one, whereby the higher the score suggests the pocket is estimated to be more druggable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the PDB structure 6W61 was validated against the X-ray crystal structure of nsp10-nsp16 by Krafcikova et al (PDB ID:6YZ1) [ 36 ] using PyMOL [ 37 ]. Furthermore, to detect potential binding pocket based on the structure nsp10-nsp16, Protein Plus DoGSiteScorer [ 38 ], binding site detection was used to calculate the druggability score. The druggability score values range between zero and one, whereby the higher the score suggests the pocket is estimated to be more druggable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The human Iba1 3D structure was retrieved from Protein Data Bank (PDB ID: 2D58) and was used to perform molecular docking with natural products such as Curcumin, Cannabidiol, Ginsenosides, Resveratrol and Sulforane using AutoDock 4.2 (Morris et al, 2009). Further, visualization of drug pockets on Iba1 protein, protein-ligand interaction and analysis of hydrogen bond formation was analyzed by ProteinsPlus server (Schöning-Stierand et al, 2020) and LigPlot2. The DoGSiteScorer analysis of ProteinsPlus server for predicting potential drug binding sites (pockets) showed presence of 5 drug pocket sites on Iba1 which can be used for drug binding.…”
Section: Sulforaphanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The molecular graphics program incorporated in 1-Clik Mcule was used for structural visualization of protein-ligand interactions and to obtain the snapshot of Fig. 4, while the protein-ligand interaction diagram shown in the same figure was obtained by ProteinsPlus (https :// prote ins.plus/) (Rarey et al 2020).…”
Section: Molecular Dockingmentioning
confidence: 99%